Best weight loss apps, tested by our editors

Best weight loss apps, tested by our editors

A recent global study by Ipsos carried out across 30 countries found that 45% of people globally say they are currently trying to lose weight. According to the CDC’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, people who lose weight gradually and steadily (about 1 to 2 pounds per week) are more successful at keeping weight off. Using a weight loss app on your smartphone or laptop computer can help, giving you a convenient and reliable way to track your slow but steady progress.

“Weight loss apps can be a great way to help adults be aware of their nutrition and lifestyle habits,” says Jaime Coffey Martinez, MS, RD, owner and founder of Nutrition CPR LLC, a health and wellness center. Martinez is a Registered Dietician with over 20 years of experience in the fields of medical nutrition therapy, weight loss, functional medicine, sports nutrition, corporate wellness and fitness, private nutrition coaching, and pharmaceuticals. “In addition to tracking your food intake,” continues Martinez, “many offer support forums, recipes and an ability to sync with other apps such as fitness trackers and smart scales. These are all beneficial tools in an individual’s weight loss journey.”

To find the best weight loss app, we tested five candidates over the course of five weeks. On our list were the premium (i.e., paid) versions of LoseIt! Premium, MyFitnessPal Premium, MyNetDiary Premium, Noom and WW (formerly, Weight Watchers). We tested each of them for ease of setup, design, features and cost.

We learned two important things during testing: 1) all of the apps can help you track your food intake and activity levels, and 2) some apps are easier to use and update. After our testing was complete, we named LoseIt! Premium the winner because of its simplicity, intuitiveness, and affordability.

Best weight loss app overall

LoseIt Premium

We found LoseIt! Premium to be simple and intuitive, and the most affordable of the weight loss apps we tested. It offers robust support for its user community, with active nutrition- and weight loss-related user forum discussions.

LoseIt! Premium’s beauty is in its simplicity. During testing, we noted that this app’s primary focus is on losing weight. It offers personalized weight loss plans, meal and exercise planning and food logging. Its home screen was a diary of the food we ate that day. Entering our food consumption was a simple matter of just touching the “Add” button for the meal, and then entering the details of each food item at the top of the screen.

The LoseIt! Premium app included branded food and drink items, so we were able to enter the brand name of a food — such as Wegmans Pulled Pork Barbecue — and get the number of calories in it. Likewise, we could look for something — such as Bacardi Black Dark Rum — and compare its calories with other types of dark rum. This prevented us from being in a quandary over which item to buy while we shopped.

An important, but often overlooked, capability of a great weight loss app is its ability to let a user make changes quickly and easily; the LoseIt! Premium app gave us this ability. With some other apps we tested, if we mistakenly entered the wrong food name, then removing the entry was often complicated, sometimes seemingly impossible. But edits we made in the LoseIt! Premium app were simple and intuitive.

To make changes, we just clicked on an entry. To remove an entry, we just clicked the “X” on the right-hand side in the web app or we slid the entry to the left in the mobile app and touched “Delete.”

We were able to add activity, including exercise, manually during testing. You could also add activity through the use of a wearable device such as an Apple Watch. The app incorporated our activity in its calorie calculations, meaning we could offset what we ate through activity.

Once you've started tracking food, the LoseIt! Premium app keeps track of items you eat frequently, making it easier to track items you eat most often.

LoseIt! Premium also includes robust goal-setting features and support for a community of users. We noted its many lively discussion forums, which were nutrition- and weight loss-related rather than the random discussions we often found in the other apps.

You can use LoseIt! Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. LoseIt! Premium also offers integration with running apps Runkeeper and Strava.

You can sign up for a seven-day free trial. You can stay with the free version of LoseIt!, but know that it offers fewer features than the Premium app. The Premium (or paid) account option starts off at $39.99 per year, which is the least expensive of the weight loss apps we tested. You can also sign up for a lifetime Premium membership for $149.99.

In a recent report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it was found that few Americans eat close to their daily recommendations of fruits and vegetables. One of the ways you can be sure you’re eating enough fruits and vegetables is by tracking your intake in a weight loss app. While there are differences in their approach, all of the weight loss apps we tested depend on you accurately tracking your food intake and recording it in the app. This alone can be crucial to your overall weight loss journey, if only because it can be so easy to forget what and how much you ate if you don’t consistently track it.

“The main features of most apps are tracking and goal setting,” says Evan M. Forman, Ph.D., Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Director of the Center for Weight, Eating and Lifestyle Science (the WELL Center) at Drexel University. Dr. Forman is also the author of a clinician guide and workbook called “Effective Weight Loss: An Acceptance-based Behavior Approach” for Oxford University Press’s Treatments that Work series. “Those are important features, but they are not going to be enough for most people,” continues Dr. Forman.

“For example, it takes a lot of effort to track everything you eat, and even more effort to do it accurately (which requires a good deal of weighing and measuring). So, most people will need help with motivation, whether in the form of cognitive-behavioral skills or someone to whom they are accountable. They also may need an expert coach who can review their food records for accuracy and to make suggestions.”

Nutrition CPR’s Jaime Coffey Martinez agrees, adding that people need to keep in mind that weight loss apps are not an exact science into your nutrition, but instead, “more of a window into your intake and habits.”

Martinez points out that some apps allow individuals to enter a food into the database and the nutrition information may not be entered correctly, causing totals and tracking to be incorrect. In our testing, the better weight loss apps did link to cloud-based databases that contained the calorie content of thousands of foods and other consumables. They showed us the value of standard servings and they even showed us the effect of differing preparation methods, such as whether a food is fried, broiled or eaten raw.

Unfortunately, some of the apps we tested did indeed have databases with errors or poorly chosen serving sizes. This is the reason why you should remain realistic about what weight loss apps can do for you.

“I recommend clients use them as a tool but not the holy grail when reviewing their nutrition,” says Martinez. “My biggest piece of advice for clients when using weight loss apps is to not get wrapped around the axle with numbers. Clients can become ‘numbers obsessed’ and can develop an unhealthy relationship with food. Instead, use them as a guide and to help with accountability. Remember, it is about the journey, not one food or one entry.”

When it comes to choosing the right weight loss app for you, Nutrition CPR’s Jaime Coffey Martinez and Drexel University’s Dr. Evan M. Forman have some advice. Martinez says to make sure it includes “the ability to sync with other apps and devices” to track physical activity.

According to Martinez, weight loss apps are particularly helpful tools because they can provide accountability, motivation and structure to help individuals achieve their overall fitness and healthy lifestyle goals.

“Apps allow tracking of not only calories but, more importantly, macronutrient balances (carbs, proteins and fats) and habits such as the timing of your meals and snacking,” explains Martinez. “In addition, many apps also track fiber, sugar, water and specific nutrients,” she continues, “which can be instrumental in a targeted approach to proper nutrition based on goals and medical history. The ability to also track lifestyle habits, and sync with other health apps and devices, addresses a multifaceted approach to weight loss.”

Dr. Forman points out that tracking everything you eat is hard work, so you want an app that makes this as easy as possible. “For instance, you should choose an app that has foods that you eat (whether branded or not) in its tracking database,” he says. “Also, you want an app that makes it easy to create and save custom foods, recipes, and meals because that’s a real timesaver.”

He also advises to make sure the app you choose includes easy ways to sync your weight and physical activity, if you track those using wireless devices like a wireless scale or an activity band or watch. “In addition, many people will benefit from an app that will help you develop important cognitive-behavioral skills and strategies,” he says.

According to Dr. Forman, people should choose apps that have coaches because they “will help you be successful both in terms of guidance and in terms of accountability,” he explains. “Having regular meetings with a coach is one of the best ways to keep yourself accountable.”

When all is said and done, people need to remain realistic about what weight loss apps can do for them. These apps don’t always help bring about massive weight loss for everyone who uses them.

“Weight loss apps are the most convenient, least expensive and therefore most popular method of losing weight,” says Dr. Forman. “[But] if an app doesn’t work for you, don’t give up,” he advises. “Weight loss and weight loss maintenance are supremely difficult and you may well need professional help.”

During our pre-testing research, we found there are many different weight loss apps available for download. We selected our five candidates by making sure they were all subscription-based, either paid monthly or annually.

We made sure all five apps we selected could run on both Android or iOS devices and can be used through their respective websites from a desktop or laptop computer. The apps all needed an active connection to the internet to retrieve information such as calorie counts and to their respective cloud services to store their data.

We installed each of the five apps to our iPhone 13 Pro smartphone running iOS 15.5. The web apps were reached using a variety of browsers running on computers running Microsoft Windows 10 or 11.

We tested each of them with the following criteria in mind: ease of installation and setup, ease of use, design, features offered and cost.

To start testing, we first created an account with each app and initiated the sign-up process. Each of the apps required a signup process that included questions about current height, weight and gender, goals, and in some cases more details about lifestyles and activity. Despite being provided identical information, each of the apps produced different weight loss strategies and different durations, and all suggested different goals.

We tested all five apps by recording meals over the course of five weeks, entering food items into each one at the conclusion of each meal. We depended on the nutrition information contained in each app’s database or we entered nutrition information for foods not contained in the database.

Lastly, we then checked out the user forums the apps provided, if any, and noted how helpful the topics discussed were.

MyFitnessPal is a complete calorie counter that also helps keep track of your activity. Food tracking uses a detailed and expansive database with hundreds of millions of entries. Exercise tracking, likewise, includes detailed choices such as a choice of 16 entries under the “Walking” section.

MyFitnessPal Premium offers food analysis tools, exercise tracking tools, individualized coaching, a recipe log, a food database, workout routines and smartphone meal scanning.

You can use MyFitnessPal Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. MyFitnessPal Premium offers integration with running apps Runkeeper and Strava, among other apps.

MyFitnessPal Premium shows you a summary of your food intake and exercise along with an encouraging message each day.

You can sign up for a one-month free trial. The paid account option starts off at $19.99 per month. You can also sign up for a 12-month membership upfront for $79.99.

Though we tested the paid version, we noticed that the free version of MyFitnessPal may be all you need. Unlike some apps where the premium version adds some significant features, the free version of MyFitnessPal can be sufficient for most users.

The premium version of MyFitnessPal eliminates pop-up ads and gives you access to a wider selection of foods. But at a steep $19.99 per month (or close to $240 per year), you might decide you can deal with its free version’s ads.

MyNetDiary Premium offers personalized weight loss plans, meal and exercise planning, food logging, community support, and more. Included in MyNetDiary Premium is support for several types of diets, including Calorie Counting, Keto, Low-Carb, Mediterranean, Vegan, Vegetarian and more.

You can use MyNetDiary Premium as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. MyNetDiary Premium also offers integration with Fitbit fitness trackers, Garmin Connect-enabled devices and with Withings Wi-Fi smart scales, blood pressure monitors and activity trackers.

It was clear to us that MyNetDiary considers itself in direct competition with MyFitnessPal, if only because of the extensive section on its website explaining the differences between the two. And there are important differences, including MyNetDiary Premium’s support for your smartwatch and extensive support for its free version.

MyNetDiary Premium shows you a list of foods that you commonly log to make recording meals easy.

We thought using the free version of MyNetDiary was easier than with MyFitnessPal’s free version. For one thing, we weren’t bombarded with pop-up ads and upgrade offers.

In addition, MyNetDiary claims that its database is more reliable than MyFitnessPal’s, with all of the food items in the former being verified. This means that we weren’t as likely to search for a food in MyNetDiary’s database and then get several choices back that were different each time.

MyNetDiary Premium (or paid) account option starts off at $9 per month or $108 per year (paid monthly), which is less than half the annual price of both MyFitnessPal and WW. You can also sign up for a 12-month membership of MyNetDiary Premium — paid upfront — for $60.

Noom offers one-on-one coaching with a coach, support groups facilitated by a group coach and daily lessons. Noom’s daily lessons were intended to help us with our weight loss journey. The lessons were aimed at the psychology of weight loss which, the company says, would help build our confidence.

Noom also offers tools for food logging and calorie and exercise tracking. Its calorie tracking feature proved to be similar to the other weight loss apps we tested, but some of Noom’s results mystified us during testing.

For example, when we tried to track more than one cup of coffee during a meal, we got dropped into a part of the app where coffee is measured by the bowl, not the cup — and the size of the bowl is not given. It took us an extra step to track our two cups of coffee.

Noom provides a handy summary page that shows your daily progress for the types of food you're consuming.

To us, Noom, the company, appears to have positioned itself as the alternative to WW in its ads and positioning. Noom makes a point of stressing that its app is based on psychology rather than on simply counting calories. This may be why the company has recently introduced a stress management program in addition to weight loss.

You can use Noom as both a web app on your desktop or laptop computer, and as a mobile app on Android devices or iOS mobile devices such as the Apple Watch. On iOS, Noom syncs with a wide range of health and fitness apps, but the company says the app “only syncs your steps and weight information. If you want to sync blood pressure or blood glucose data, you’ll need to use a compatible monitoring device. If the app you’re syncing with Noom only tracks step data (not weight), then the step data will show up in Noom.” The list of compatible apps it can integrate with includes Fitbit, Garmin, iHealth, Misfit, Omron, Polar, Qardio, Runkeeper, Withings and Yoo.

You can sign up for a seven-day free trial of Noom. The paid account option starts off at $60 per month (which comes to approximately $720 per year, paid monthly). But it’s also available in multiple-month timeframes, paid upfront. For example, you can pay for a 12-month membership — upfront — for $199.

WW (formerly, Weight Watchers) is probably the best-known weight loss program around. The program is known for its in-person weekly meetings in which members are motivated by peer contact and advice from professional leaders. WW is now also available through a weight loss app that will lead you through the program.

The WW app offers customized food plans, meal planners, a smartphone barcode scanner for easy shopping, and a restaurant and recipe database with over 11,000 recipes. It also provides on-demand workouts with the ability to sync with fitness trackers, 24/7 live chat with a coach and weekly progress reports. It also lets you track your activity, food and water intake, and weight.

A significant difference is that the WW app — like the in-person program — does not count calories. Rather, the app assigns you a “PersonalPoints Budget,” with an individualized ZeroPoint foods list. The points for each food item are based on a number of criteria for each type of food. ZeroPoint foods are food items that contain zero points. Each user is assigned a daily point target within their PersonalPoints Budget, with the idea that, by staying within the recommended points budget, the user will lose weight.

WW provides a summary of your daily consumption, but instead of calories consumed, it provides its own points system.

However, we found the points system in the app to be confusing. This was because points assigned to a food item differed depending on factors other than the characteristics of the food itself. And those differences depended on which of the many customized plans WW uses. So, you might find that some fresh fruit contains zero points assigned in your plan but the fresh fruit does contain points in another user’s plan. These differences in the app made choosing food while shopping or in meal preparation difficult for us.

In addition, WW seems to change its plans annually, which means you may have to relearn the program and app each year. Fortunately, though, we thought WW seems to be based on sound nutritional principles, so we thought we were healthy while using the app.

You can use WW as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices. The WW app syncs with the WW Body Analysis Bluetooth Scale (made by Conair) and auto-tracks your weight for you. The WW app syncs with Fitbit, Google Fit and Withings activity trackers.

WW’s paid account option starts off at $19.99 per month. You can also sign up for a 6-month membership upfront for $113.99. The app is also included with all WW memberships.

Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing and fitness coverage:

.

Best language learning apps in 2022, tested by our editors

Best language learning apps in 2022, tested by our editors

The summer travel season is well underway, and you and your loved ones might have plans to squeeze in one last trip before back-to-school season and autumn starts. If you’re traveling soon to a place where you don’t know the language well (or at all), then you’ll want to download a language learning app to your smartphone before you embark on your journey. These apps can help you whether you’re on your latest family summer vacation, a trip with friends or even a honeymoon.

“I always advise clients who book trips with us to use a language learning app if they don’t already know the language where they’re going. I’ve done it myself on my vacations,” says travel agent Liz Harnos, co-owner of Burr Travel, a Northport, New York-based travel agency. “These apps can help you learn enough that you’ll be able to order food, ask for directions and other basic things during your trip.”

Even if you have no travel plans in the near future and you just want to learn a new language for your own betterment, then using a language learning app on your smartphone or laptop can be the right choice for you. To find the best one, we tested five candidates over the course of five weeks. On our list were the premium (i.e., paid) versions of Babbel, Busuu Premium Plus, Memrise, Rosetta Stone and Super Duolingo. We tested each of them for ease of setup, design and features.

We learned two important things during testing: 1) some of the apps are easier to use than others, and 2) these apps can teach you the basics for up to 38 different languages, depending on the app. When all our testing was done, we found that Rosetta Stone emerged as the winner because of its easy-to-use design and the way it presented its lessons in the most logical manner.

Best language learning app overall

Rosetta Stone

We liked the Rosetta Stone app’s easy-to-use design and logical lesson format. It helped us learn the basics of French rather easily. It’s available in 25 languages, including Dutch, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean and Spanish. It offers a three-day free trial.

There’s a good reason why the language learning app Rosetta Stone is the gros chien (that is, the big dog) of the apps we tested. It’s well designed, flexible and assumes you are an adult when you first log in. It worked well on our smartphone, although it appeared in landscape mode rather than portrait mode. It also worked well on our computer as a web app.

When we started testing Rosetta Stone, we were asked to provide our email address, then we were asked to choose a language to learn. In the French version we chose, we were welcomed in French and then we clicked on “Get Started.” At this point, we were asked about our level of fluency. We were given choices for Beginner, Intermediate and Proficient. We chose Beginner.

We were then asked about our goals for learning the language, including travel, family, work or “basics and beyond.” We started with Travel. From there, we were presented with the core lessons and a reminder that we had three days left in our free trial. We were offered the chance to sign up immediately to get a discount.

When we started using the app, the first question we were asked was to choose our gender and indicate if we were a child or adult. This helped the speech recognition engine understand our voice.

Next, we were asked to test our microphone by counting to five. And that’s it.

The next step started with “Bonjour,” which we repeated into our microphone, and then we were off learning French.

Rosetta Stone started us off with a few words and a few short sentences. The examples were paired with photos illustrating what each represents, which is one of the reasons why it helps to spend at least part of the time using the app on a large screen. Using a smartphone, we can imagine it could be tough for some folks to see if pictures of children are boys or girls.

Next, we were taken through conversational situations, such as what we might say in a café. We were also given the option to schedule a session with a tutor, study situational phrasebooks or listen to native speakers tell stories.

We found the progression in Rosetta Stone to be logical, and better yet, we found when we reviewed the lessons that we had retained the words, the grammar and the pronunciation. While we weren’t fluent by the end of the testing period, we were familiar enough with the language that we could order a coffee and lunch at a café without horrifying the waitstaff.

The Rosetta Stone app works in the landscape orientation. Here you see a practice word. You can play it with the blue arrow and you can speak the word by pressing the green microphone.

Rosetta Stone offers lessons in 25 languages, including Arabic, Chinese (Mandarin), Dutch, Greek, English (American and British), French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Spanish (Latin America and Spain), Turkish and Vietnamese. You can use Rosetta Stone as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices.

You can sign up for a three-day free trial. Once you sign up for a paid account, the company offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. The paid account option starts off at $11.99 per month for three months.

During our pre-testing research, we found there are many different language learning apps available. We selected our five candidates and made sure they were all subscription-based. We tested each of them with the following criteria in mind: ease of installation and setup, ease of use, design and features offered.

To start testing, we first created an account with each app and initiated the sign-up process. We downloaded the French version of each app to our iPhone 13 Pro smartphone. We chose French because all of the language learning apps offered it and it was a language that we didn’t already know. However, each of the apps we tested is available in multiple languages; most include English, French, German, Italian and Spanish.

The apps we tested ran on our smartphone, but they also could run from a tablet or as a web app run from a desktop or laptop computer. They all offered us some form of a free introductory lesson so that we could decide whether or not we liked them before committing.

While we found that each app is different in the details of how it approaches language learning, we learned that they shared certain characteristics. For example, they all showed us a picture of an object or an action and displayed the word associated with it. Each app presented us with the aural version of the word, and the app’s speech recognition feature listened to our pronunciation.

Some apps asked us to spell out words in order to answer questions, while others asked us to pick from a choice of words. They all let us revisit a lesson to improve our understanding.

Each of these apps tried to focus its approach to match our familiarity with the language being studied. When we started the app for the first time, we were asked how familiar we were with the language, and the app put us through a short test to get more details on our ability. This means that someone who has a rudimentary knowledge of a language won’t be forced through the basics unless they want to start there.

One factor we discovered during testing is that a smartphone may not be the best platform for these apps. While convenient, there are times when a larger screen is a real benefit and when a good microphone will help the software understand you. Each of the apps depended on images to illustrate words and actions, and the small screen of a smartphone made it hard for us to discern some important details.

Likewise, we found that each app had some speech recognition failures that could be attributed to either the quality of the microphone in our smartphone, or the fact that the microphone was being obscured by how the smartphone was held.

The language learning app Babbel is another one of the major players in this space. While its approach is similar to Rosetta Stone in some ways, Babbel started us off at a faster pace, sometimes with words that weren’t previously covered in the course.

In addition, we experienced minor glitches with both its mobile app and its web app. The web app would lose contact with our microphone after screen changes at times, and the smartphone app didn’t seem precise in voice recognition. What we mean by that is, we would deliberately say a word incorrectly, but the smartphone app would still accept it.

Babbel says it tailors its course according to the language with which you’re starting, so a native English speaker would have a different experience than a native Spanish speaker when using the app to learn French.

Babbel starts off with only a few words, repeated often in simple contexts. This may be a good approach for someone who hasn’t studied a foreign language before or who has difficulties learning languages. Babbel also offers courses with live instructors in a group setting.

With Babbel, you can choose the type of practice you wish to do, such as reviews of what you've already learned or tackling new material.

Babbel offers lessons in 14 languages, namely Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese (Brazilian), Russian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish. You can use Babbel as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices.

You can register with Babbel for free, and the first lesson in every course is free to try. If you sign up for the paid version, then the company offers a 20-day money-back guarantee. After that, it costs $14.95 per month.

The language learning app Busuu Premium Plus was recently acquired by Chegg, Inc. Initially, you can get a free week of learning with Busuu Premium Plus, while learning in what the company calls “bite-sized lessons.”

During testing, we experienced Busuu’s approach to learning, which was to have us say basic words and phrases — such as “Excuse me” in French — followed by taking a short quiz where we answered a question about the phrase.

But there was little explanation offered to us as to what the actual French words we were using meant. We also received no real explanation of verbs or gender. As a result, we thought it’s an app that relies mostly on rote memorization, without much understanding on the user’s part.

One example of this was when we completed a fill-in-the-blanks exercise of a conversation; we didn’t receive much instruction about the vocabulary. It seemed to us that this method might be confusing to a new French learner without much exposure to the language. Adding to the confusion, it wasn’t easy for us to go back a little earlier in our lesson to clarify things or to review anything.

Busuu Premium Plus is probably an excellent approach for learners who have some prior exposure to the language, but overall, using it seemed to us to be like learning to swim by starting out at the deep end.

Offers to get you to spend more money constantly pop up in the Busuu Premium Plus app as you're using it.

Busuu Premium Plus offers lessons in 13 languages, including Arabic, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Turkish. You can use Busuu Premium Plus as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices.

You can sign up for the basic version of Busuu, which is free. The company offers a 14-day money-back guarantee. After that, Busuu Premium Plus costs $12.99 per month.

The language learning app Memrise uses words and phrases spoken in short videos that we then got to select from a list. The selection of words and phrases was more advanced than it was in some of the other language learning apps we tested. If you’re planning to travel to France and use the French that you learned from an app, then Memrise’s approach might be better.

However, this app took more focus for us to use than with, say, Super Duolingo. Memrise says that its method uses “scientific memory techniques.” That may be the case, but we think this is one app where it appears that it will only pay rewards if you approach it seriously and with much concentration.

It’s also worth noting that many of the exercises in Memrise required us to actually type in the answer rather than pick out an answer from a multiple choice list. Because (like us) you’re probably using an American English keyboard, Memrise supplies the additional characters from the French alphabet for you to choose.

Overall, we thought this is a well-intentioned and well-designed app, but it required more work on our part to understand and use.

You can choose from a variety of learning scenarios with Memrise, but only some of them are included in its basic program. All of the lessons in yellow cost extra.

Memrise offers lessons in 23 languages, including Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English (US and UK), French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Korean, Japanese, Norwegian, Portuguese (Brazil and Portugal), Russian and Spanish (Mexico and Spain). You can use Memrise as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices.

Memrise is partly free, which means the basic instruction is there, but most of the really useful instruction requires an upgraded account. The company offers four subscription plans: Monthly, Annual, Quarterly and Lifetime. We tested the monthly version, which costs $8.49 per month.

With the language learning app Super Duolingo (formerly Duolingo Plus), we started off on our smartphone, learning with cartoons. Most of the lessons began with single words or short sentences, each with English translations. Testing went smoothly during this time.

However, when we used the web app, we encountered problems with the voice recognition portion of some lessons. There were times when even simple words we said weren’t recognized, while at other times they were.

Beyond that, Super Duolingo took things in very small steps, both in terms of vocabulary and in terms of sentence complexity. The result of Super Duolingo’s approach was that our learning moved along steadily, if in small steps. But the app is designed so that these very small steps move along quickly.

The app also offered us trumpets and virtual confetti and the like whenever we got a correct answer; there were lots of celebrations when we completed a task. We thought this was something that might appeal to younger learners but perhaps not to most older adults.

Overall, we thought learning with Super Duolingo was fast and easy. It’s the sort of thing you can do day after day without feeling like you’re working, which is a real plus when it comes to learning a language.

Super Duolingo's menu lets you choose from a number of scenarios so you can practice what interests you at the moment.

Super Duolingo offers lessons in 38 languages, including Arabic, Chinese, Czech, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Polish, Romanian and Spanish. You can use Super Duolingo as both a web app and a mobile app for Android or iOS mobile devices.

The basic version of Duolingo is free. Super Duolingo — the upgraded version that we tested — can be tried for free for two weeks. After that, it costs $6.99 per month.

Read more from CNN Underscored’s hands-on testing and travel coverage:

.

Beyerdynamic Free Byrd earbud review

Beyerdynamic Free Byrd earbud review

Beyerdynamic has long been a household name in the audiophile world, best known for its popular, premium over-ear headphones. So what happens when the company distills its signature sound prowess into a pair of true wireless earbuds? You get the Free Byrd: A $249 pair of buds with dependable active noise cancellation, superb battery life and excellent sound that’s worthy of the Beyerdynamic name.

But while Beyerdynamic’s first-ever true wireless earbuds have a lot going for them, they’re held back by frustrating controls and a bulky design that might not be for everyone. Before you make the big $249 splurge, here’s what I think after nearly a month of using these buds during work, play, travel and everything in-between.

Beyerdynamic Free Byrd

A great pick for audiophiles who are willing to splurge, the Beyerdynamic Free Byrd offer some of the best sound quality and battery life you can find in a pair of premium earbuds. However, those turned off by their bulky design and inconsistent touch controls should look at the Sony WF-1000XM4 or cheaper options like the AirPods Pro.

Mike Andronico/CNN

The second I opened the box, I could see how the Beyerdynamic Free Byrd set themselves apart from any other pair of wireless earbuds I’ve tested. That’s because these buds ship with a whopping 8 pairs of ear tips — that includes five silicone tips ranging from extra small to extra large, as well as foam options in small, medium and large for those who need something more sweat-friendly while working out.

That’s an unheard of level of physical customization — most buds include three or four sets of tips — and for folks that usually have a hard time finding the right fit (or want to be able to swap out ear tips once they get sweaty), could make the Free Byrd worth the price of admission alone. Once I settled on the standard large tips, I was treated to a lightweight, secure fit that made it easy to completely forget I was wearing the buds during long bouts of working, walking and traveling. Well, until I looked in the mirror or tried to lay down, but more on that later.

Mike Andronico/CNN Underscored

On top of feeling great in-ear, the Free Byrd are some of the longest-lasting earbuds I’ve ever used. I got through close to a whole week of listening without even having to charge the case, and that’s including long work hours, train rides, dog walks and even a few flights — all with active noise cancellation activated most of the time. I was truly staggered by the Free Byrd’s endurance, as even some of my favorite buds (including the Beats Fit Pro and Sony LinkBuds S) required me to plug in the case after three or four days of regular use.

Beyerdynamic’s buds alone are rated for up to 11 hours of runtime, with an additional 19 hours from the case, and my testing lines up with that — if not exceeds it. That puts them roughly in line with the 12 hours and 30 minutes we got from the similarly high-end Sony WF-1000XM4 (our current best noise-canceling earbuds pick), and well ahead of the 5 hours and 30 minutes we eked out of the Bose QuietComfort buds.

Great, customizable audio and strong noise cancellation

Mike Andronico/CNN Underscored

Beyerdynamic is one of the biggest names in the high-end audio space, so it’s no surprise that their first true wireless earbuds sound great. The crunchy guitars, rollicking bass and snappy drums of my favorite punk songs all sounded bright and loud without overpowering one another, and I could clearly make out the dueling vocal harmonies in Phoebe Bridgers’ ethereal electronic ballad “Sidelines.” I was happy to use the Free Byrd as my main music headphones for close to a month, and found them to offer fuller overall sound and deeper bass than the more mainstream buds I usually use like the Beats Fit Pro and LinkBuds S.

I found the Free Byrd to sound fantastic out of the box, but you can tweak them to your liking using the MIY companion app for iOS or Android.  The app lets you create a personalized sound profile by completing a quick audio test, which consists of a few minutes of holding a virtual button every time you hear a beep. Once the app has gauged your hearing style, you can use a slider to decide how much of your personalized profile you want to use versus the earbuds’ default settings. I didn’t notice a big difference in quality after doing this test, but it’s a nice extra for those with a super discerning ear.

The MIY app also has a handful of sound presets, including bass boost for thumping low-end and a speech setting for amplifying voices during podcasts. These all work as advertised, though certain settings like “v-shape” and “brilliance” might not mean much to non-audiophiles. Either way, the Free Byrd offer excellent audio quality even before you make any tweaks, and these equalizer settings are there for folks who like tinkering. The app even lets you dig into stats such as your total time spent listening to music and taking calls, which was handy for writing this very review.

A $249 pair of earbuds better have good active noise cancellation, and fortunately, that’s absolutely the case here. The Free Byrd did a good job dampening everything from my overworked air conditioner to the loud clangs of construction outside my apartment. I found Beyerdynamic’s ANC to be a bit stronger than Beats’, though Sony’s LinkBuds S were a little more suppressive than both when I tested them against my noisy New York street. The Free Byrd’s Transparency mode is likewise reliable, amplifying all of the aforementioned sounds when I needed to stay alert while walking my dog (though it also made her barking sound extra harsh). I just wish switching between the two modes was a little easier, but more on that later.

Mike Andronico/CNN Underscored

As great as the Free Byrd feel and sound, their unreliable touch controls are frustrating enough to make me want to switch to something else. While Beyerdynamic’s buds offer all of the requisite control options — such as pausing playback, skipping songs and adjusting volume — they’re stuck behind inconsistent touch inputs and a few odd gestures that you can’t customize. It often took multiple attempts for me to simply pause a song with a single tap, and double-tapping to switch between noise canceling and Transparency mode didn’t always work well either. And while each tap is met with an audible beep to let you know which control you’re about to activate, those sounds often got buried by my music.

My other big issue is that some of the Free Byrd’s controls just don’t feel natural. I’ve grown accustomed to using one tap to pause playback and two taps to skip songs on most earbuds, but these buds use a strange, unintuitive pattern of pause/play (one tap), noise control (two taps) and skip song (three taps). This wouldn’t be as big a deal if you could customize the controls via the MIY companion app, but unfortunately, you cannot. Perhaps I’ve been spoiled by the accurate physical controls on my Beats earbuds, but even recent touch-based models such as the Sony LinkBuds S are far more reliable.

Mike Andronico/CNN Underscored

This may be a matter of personal preference, but I don’t find the Free Byrd to be very pleasing aesthetically. While some music fans may appreciate their guitar pick-inspired shape, these buds are some of the bulkiest I’ve ever seen. I don’t love the way their thick exterior juts out of my ears when I’m out and about, and even if you take my vanity out of the equation, their large design made them uncomfortable to wear when I used them to listen to some sleep sounds while laying down (to be fair, there are dedicated sleep headphones for that, like our top-rated Bose Sleepbuds 2). The Free Byrd buds aren’t unique in this regard — the Bose QuietComfort earbuds are similarly bulky but offer top-notch ANC in return — so you’ll have to weigh whether you care more about style or performance.

The Free Byrd’s case also takes up a good amount of pocket space (and is extremely prone to smudges and scuffs), and while they’re comfortable to wear overall, each 2.1-ounce bud feels noticeably heavier than the Beats Fit Pro I typically use.

Mike Andronico/CNN

When it comes to sound quality, battery life and active noise cancellation, the Beyerdynamic Free Byrd are worth their hefty $249 price tag. They’re some of the best-sounding wireless earbuds you can buy, and they last longer than nearly all of the competition. Their handy companion app and plethora of swappable ear tips certainly don’t hurt either.

However, the Free Byrd’s bulky design and unreliable touch controls hold them back from being the best wireless earbuds for my daily use. However, if you care more about great performance than having a stylish pair of buds in your ears, the Free Byrd could be an excellent fit for you — especially since they’re cheaper and longer-lasting than the similarly chunky Bose QuietComfort buds.

But as compelling as a package as the Free Byrd are, I’d still point most people to alternatives like the AirPods Pro, Beats Fit Pro and LinkBuds S, which are sleeker, have more dependable controls, and are typically way cheaper. And if you do want to splurge, the $279 Sony WF-1000XM4 remain our premium ANC pick thanks to their deeper sound customization options and superior design.

.

Valve Index review: The best premium VR headset for PC gamers

Valve Index review: The best premium VR headset for PC gamers

From being a first-rate developer of contemporary gaming classics like Half-Life and Dota to establishing the industry’s biggest PC gaming storefront in Steam, Valve’s evolution has been jaw-dropping. After spending the last decade attempting to carve out space within the hardware world, the Washington-based company most recently surprised many with the well-received Steam Deck. However, its virtual reality initiative is what properly set the stage for its successful run of devices after the failed Steam Machine consoles. Following its collaboration with HTC on the first-generation Vive VR headset, 2019 saw Valve produce and manufacture its own VR device with the Valve Index.

Available for $999, the Valve Index is built to be used on the company’s Steam platform. This means users have access to well over 200 games and productivity applications. PC gamers that are already deep in the Steam ecosystem — and have equally deep pockets — will find much to appreciate about the Valve Index, including the phenomenal headset itself as well as its wonderful controllers. Compared to other wired VR headsets, it simply doesn’t get better than this.

If you have the budget for it, the Valve Index is the best PC-based VR headset you can buy.

Outstanding design for both headset and controllers

Ural Garrett/CNN Underscored

Opening the all-black box reveals everything needed to get the Valve Index up and running in a seriously organized presentation. Both the headset and knuckle controllers are the first thing users will see on the first layer, above the second compartment housing the dual trackers in addition to necessary cables. It all makes a wonderful first impression.

One of the most noticeable things about the Valve Index is how thoughtful the design is all around. Despite being heavier than the Meta Quest 2, PlayStation VR and HP Reverb G2, the even weight distribution on the headset doesn’t feel uncomfortable even during long play sessions. The plastic head harness for the Valve Index sits on top of the head comfortably, thanks to plenty of padding from the face to the head. Similar to the PSVR, users fasten the Index using a dial, though there’s also a front strap to tighten the headset itself securely on the face. On the right side is another dial to position the screens closer to or away from the eyes. Finally, there’s a focal point slider underneath the headset for added eye comfort as well. Again, all of these features make using the Valve Index an experience that always feels comfortable.

The faceplate is removable via magnets and houses a USB-A slot. This allows for things such as a third-party external fan, which should keep the Valve Index from getting too hot, but that wasn’t much of a problem even during sessions that lasted well over an hour. As a nice touch during gameplay, there’s a button that opens Steam VR, which provides an overlay for quickly switching games and other prompts like camera pass-through. While the Index has built-in audio, users can also plug in their own headphones or gaming headset by removing the face pad to reveal the 3.5mm headset jack.

That level of comfort extends to the knuckle controllers too. After utilizing these dual controllers for a week, I can confidently say that these are the benchmark standard for VR input. Inserting palms into the cloth strap and pulling the drawstring below the controller makes these feel like an extension of your hands instead of just controllers. Unlike most VR input devices, the controller stays attached even when hands are completely open. To loosen the strap, all users have to do is press a button near the drawstring. Meanwhile, the knuckle controllers have internal batteries that are rechargeable through USB-C ports on the bottom. During playtest, they provided around five hours of gameplay and only needed less than a few hours to charge completely.

Meanwhile, each controller has a clickable thumbstick, a touchpad, two face buttons, a menu button, a trigger and 87 sensors for various types of tracking in addition to an accelerometer. Playing games like Half-Life: Alyx and Cooking Simulator VR was exceptional, controller-wise. It was definitely difficult going back to the Meta Quest 2 and PSVR controllers. VR controllers don’t get any better than this.

Great audio and visual presentation

Ural Garrett/CNN

Though the Valve Index’s per-eye LCD screen resolution is lower than the Meta Quest 2, HP Reverb G2 and HTC Vive Pro 2, it does offer the highest refresh rate, which makes a huge difference in delivering the smoothest gameplay possible. The most popular games available don’t go higher than 120Hz, but there is experimental support for 144Hz provided users have a powerful-enough desktop.

Despite having a relatively low 1440 x 1600 resolution per eye, games look incredible on the Valve Index. Colors are rich and vivid thanks to full RGB support and purposefully backlit LCDs. It’s also easy to catch every detail, considering the field of view is around 130 degrees compared to the HP Reverb G2’s 114 degrees, Meta Quest 2’s 89 degrees and HTC Vive Pro 2’s 120 degrees. Whether you’re gaming or using a productivity app like Virtual Desktop, the Valve Index is a wonder to behold visually.

Playing games like Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx and Medal of Honor: Above and Beyond was a fantastic experience on the Index. Considering Half-Life: Alyx was developed by Valve with the Index in mind, it makes sense that this game not only looks but plays the best on the headset. From the opening scene in the City 13 apartment to the more horror-filled underground portions with little to no lighting, this game is an absolute blast on the Index. No wonder Valve Index owners get Half-Life: Alyx for free when they purchase the headset. Playing the modern benchmark for single-player VR experiences on ultra settings at 144Hz mode is face-melting. Other games with the ability to be played at 144Hz are Beat Saber and Space Pirate Trainer. Though the difference wasn’t entirely noticeable compared to other headsets, the experience was better.

Virtual Desktop looked crisp on the Valve Index and also performed well. Playing non-VR games like Forza Horizon 5, Halo: Infinite and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Shredder’s Revenge or watching movies didn’t come with a hint of slowdown on the headset.

Buyers can use their own headphones or use the off-ear headphones that come with the Valve Index. Be mindful that the audio experience of the built-in headphones is just as good as its technological sibling the HP Reverb G2. Games like Half-Life: Alyx and Medal of Honor: Above and Beyond were more immersive experiences due to how well-designed the headphones are. Like the Reverb G2, they can be pulled close to or pushed away from the ears, with volume levels that are controlled from the overlay menu or Windows sound settings. The Valve Index audio package also includes a microphone that allows for easy communication during multiplayer rounds of Population: One — or any Zoom calls you might be taking between them.

Valve

As mentioned previously, Half-Life: Alyx comes free with the purchase of a Valve Index and currently proves why VR is such a powerful platform for gaming. Then again, users are going to want to play something else once they get through its 15- to 20-hour single-player campaign. Steam has well over 200 virtual reality games available right now, and that’s not counting early access titles (which are usually extremely buggy at first).

Games like Beat Saber, Superhot VR, Five Nights at Freddy’s: Help Wanted, Boneworks, Arizona Sunshine and more are all there on Steam. The headset also supports games with VR modes like Microsoft Flight Simulator, No Man’s Sky and Star Wars: Squadrons. The Virtual Desktop app — which lets you use any Windows app in a VR environment — costs $14.99, though it’s currently discounted to $10.49.

Unlike the HP Reverb G2, the Valve Index features superb support for Revive. This means that gamers upgrading from their Oculus Rift or Rift S can still play games in their Oculus library without any issues. Games like Medal of Honor: Above and Beyond and Asgard’s Wrath worked near-perfectly on the Valve Index controllers, even with the lack of a second trigger button.

Ural Garrett/CNN Underscored

For how technologically advanced the Valve Index is, the setup process for both the hardware and software seems a bit behind the times. On average, expect to take about 20 to 30 minutes to get started.

This long setup is partially due to the use of two required tracking devices that need to be positioned across from each other. That wouldn’t be a problem if they both didn’t have to be plugged directly into the wall — meaning that Valve Index users are going to need three free power outlets. Though tracking was never an issue when using the headset, it’s not noticeably better than the Meta Quest 2, which doesn’t require separate tracking devices.

Outside of that, the actual headset itself doesn’t require a separate processor, which is a plus as it plugs directly into a DisplayPort and USB-A 3.0 port alongside your power outlet. At a minimum level, the Valve Index requires a powerful enough gaming PC with 8GB of RAM, an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 or AMD RX480 graphics card and a dual-core CPU. To run Half-Life: Alyx, users are going to need at least an Intel i5-7500 or Ryzen 5 1600 CPU, 12GB of RAM and GTX 1060 or RX 580 with at least 6GB of VRAM.

Setting up the Valve Index software is a pain though. There isn’t a passthrough guardian feature (which lets you see your real-life surroundings with the headset on) or the ability to make floor measurements like on the Meta Quest 2. During setup, users have to create a boundary and have to look at the desktop monitor. It seems a bit counter-productive as having to manually set height measurements for tracking.

Once everything is set up, the user experience on the Valve Index isn’t problematic at all. It’s just getting to that point that’s frustrating.

Ural Garrett/CNN Underscored

Valve initially made the Index available to purchase in parts (such as a headset-only option) at cheaper prices, but those are all sold out. Therefore, the only package users can currently purchase is the $999 edition that comes with everything needed to fully operate the VR headset. Considering the HP Reverb G2 is $599 and the Oculus Rift S was around $399 before getting discontinued, the high price of admission is a bit suspect. However, the value is undoubtedly there if you take everything included into consideration.

Though it lacks the high-resolution screens of the HP Reverb G2 and HTC Vive Pro 2 (which is even pricier at $1,399 for the full system), the screen still provides crisp image quality alongside the potentially higher refresh rates. That doesn’t even take into account the optimization that Valve has given the Index in regards to performance. The headset simply runs without issues. Meanwhile, the knuckle controllers are the best VR can offer.

PC gamers looking to upgrade from the Oculus Rift or Rift S who don’t want to spend that much may be better off utilizing the standalone Quest 2 with a Quest Link cable. Those that are new to VR experiences on PC and have a bit more expendable cash may want to consider the HP Reverb G2. If “Money Ain’t a Thang” like Jay-Z and Jermaine Dupri once proclaimed, by all means, get the Valve Index.

Ural Garrett/CNN

The Valve Index is a marvelous piece of VR technology through and through. From a headset and controller perspective, it’s expertly designed and efficient when it matters the most. It makes sense for Valve to give out Half-Life: Alyx as a freebie with every Index purchase, because there isn’t a game available today that displays the potential of the VR medium like it.

Between the respectable visual and audio experience and the high 144Hz refresh rate, this headset will get you plenty immersed in your favorite VR games. Whether you’re upgrading from the tethered Oculus headsets of yesteryear or attached to Steam’s digital storefront, the Valve Index manages to run applications from both ecosystems without any noticeable problems.

Just understand that this package comes with some caveats. Setting up the Valve Index isn’t completely user-friendly, and buyers may be priced out of its $999 cost. But if those aren’t dealbreakers for you, you’lll be treated to one of the best PC-based VR headsets available today.

Required system

PC (Nvidia GTX 970, AMD RX 480 or better)

None (optional PC compatibility via Quest Link)

PC (Nvidia GTX 1080, AMD RX 5700 or better)

PC (Nvidia GTX 1060, AMD RX 480 or better)

Connection type

Wired

Fully wireless

Wired

Wired or wireless (via adapter)

Weight

1.78 pounds

1.1 pounds

1.21 pounds

1.87 pounds

Resolution

1440 x 1600 per eye

1832 x 1920 per eye

2160 x 2160 per eye

2448 x 2448 per eye

Refresh rate

Up to 144Hz

Up to 120Hz

Up to 90Hz

Up to 120Hz

Storage

N/A

128GB / 256GB

N/A

N/A

Battery Life

N/A

2-3 hours

N/A

N/A

Price


$999


$299


$599


$799

.