YouTube tests 5 unskippable ads: Will users be ‘forced’ to watch more ads?

YouTube tests 5 unskippable ads: Will users be ‘forced’ to watch more ads?

YouTube, a video streaming platform, is reportedly planning to place five ads on a video which will be unskippable. The platform is currently testing this feature to make it a reality soon. At the moment, YouTube shows only two unskippable ads which is still fine for a free user. But, it seems that five ads have irked many, as several users have expressed their disappointment on Twitter. After receiving the tweets on long ads, YouTube tweeted stating that this will not happen with all the videos and that the ads would not be very long. The video streaming platform has confirmed that each ad will be only six seconds long and not more than that. It basically suggests that if there are five ads, then an individual will have to wait for approximately 30 seconds to continue watching a video on YouTube.

YouTube tweeted, “This may happen with a certain type of ad format called bumper ads, since they are only up to 6 seconds long. If you’d like, you can send feedback directly from YouTube via the send feedback tool.” In order to watch any video without ads, users can use Chrome’s ad blocker extension on their desktop. Secondly, users can spend money on YouTube’s subscription and avail some extra benefits as well. Meanwhile, in a recent development, YouTube has announced that it will offer a stripped-down version of its site tailored for schools and colleges, in an attempt to establish itself in the digital education tools market, even as it introduces new features for creators and institutions using the platform for educational content.

YouTube is introducing Player for Education and Courses, which is a feature that will let video creators offer online classes for a fee or free of charge. According to The Verge report, YouTube has announced new tools for creators making educational content on the platform, which include ways to charge viewers for their videos. Interestingly, beginning next year, certain creators will be able to make free or paid “courses,” with playlists of videos set up for audiences, according to The Verge report. “If a viewer buys a course, they’ll be able to watch the content ad-free and play the videos in the background. Courses will come to the US and South Korea first in beta,” The Verge report said.

Catch all the Technology News and Updates on Live Mint.
Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.

More
Less

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.
Topics

Post your comment

.

Facebook Alternative MeWe Raises $27 Million To Help It Become A Household Name

Facebook Alternative MeWe Raises $27 Million To Help It Become A Household Name

The MeWe social networking application is seen on an Apple iPhone in this photo illustration in Warsaw, Poland on January 12, 2021. The alt-tech, light moderation social networking MeWe app is fast becoming the go-to alternative for the now banned Parler app. Parler was a “free speech” alternative to Twitter for many Trump supporters and other conservatives until it was removed from app stores following the storming of Capitol Hill on January 6. MeWe has entered the Apple App Store top ten list after having been downloaded more than a million times in 72 hours. (Photo illustration by Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images)NurPhoto via Getty Images

The privacy-focused social networking company MeWe is looking to change its reputation from being a hub for right-wing extremist groups to a trusted Facebook alternative that people have actually heard of. To do so, the company has raised $27 million in a Series A round led by the investment firm McCourt Global, which contributed $15 million. Previous investors contributed the other $12 million. The round values MeWe at $200 million.

Along with other alternative social media networks like Parler, MeWe gained a lot of traction following the November 2020 presidential election and January 6 insurrection as a space for right-wing extremists to congregate more freely after they’d been kicked off Facebook. MeWe saw an influx of 2.5 million new users during the week of Jan. 11, 2021, and currently the platform has 20 million users.

But now, CEO Jeffrey Edell is aiming to reach a much broader audience by focusing on MeWe’s firm stance on privacy and tightening content moderation rules by hiring more staff to its content moderation team. Its Privacy Bill of Rights states that users are the only ones who own their personal information. MeWe says that its platform does not manipulate, filter, or change the order of users’ news feeds, or use facial recognition technology. Its business model is subscription focused, rather than ad-supported, like Meta’s.

According to Edell, MeWe also supports free speech if done in a respectful manner. After facing backlash as a hub for right-wing content that had been banned from Facebook, Edell says MeWe hired more people on its moderation team and also implemented AI that tracks and removes hate speech and language that calls for violence. The platform also now bans accounts that sell guns, a decision for which Edell said he’s received a lot of pushback. However, a cursory search for terms like “stop the steal” and “gun sale” brings up several related groups and posts.
Screenshots of “gun sale” and “stop the steal” searches on MeWe.Courtesy of Forbes staff
Edell, who previously served as chairman of MySpace’s parent company Intermix and joined MeWe as CEO in April, acknowledged that he was wary of joining the company at first. But he says after researching the social networking site, he realized there was only a minimal amount of extremist content.
“I looked at my wife and she looked at me and she said, ‘You’re not going to get involved in a platform that has these kinds of issues, are you?’” Edell tells Forbes. “When I did my diligence and I really looked into it, I found that that was a very small portion of the platform.”
“Every platform out there, I don’t care who it is, Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok they all have their issues,” he says. “I found that the issue was not as widespread as previously thought about.”
But the company has a bigger problem: Most people have no clue what MeWe even is. That’s why Edell is aiming to use the new funding to invest in better marketing (though the company says that won’t include ads on Facebook or Instagram).
“We’re finding that what we do resonates with people out there and people don’t even know we exist,” Edell tells Forbes. “So it’s a continuation of getting a marketing push to get the information out there of who MeWe is, and what we stand for.”
If more people are aware of MeWe and making accounts, that means more people will buy subscriptions, Edell said. While you don’t have to pay to use MeWe, the service offers a premium subscription for $4.99 a month or $29.99 annually and is the first thing advertised when users create their accounts. The package includes unlimited voice and video calls, unlimited custom emojis and stickers, 100GB of storage, story video journals, unlimited custom themes and a premium user profile badge. Ad-supported platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat already offer some of these features for free, like unlimited video and voice calls and access to custom emojis.
Part of MeWe’s marketing budget will go to encouraging users to upgrade to premium subscriptions. The company declined to share how many of its users are subscribers or its revenue.
Along with his time overseeing MySpace, Edell is a show biz veteran, producing movies like The Kids Are All Right, The Grey and National Lampoon’s Movie Madness. With a background in both entertainment and tech, he hopes to bring more short form videos and music created by users to the platform. Right now, MeWe is in the process of partnering with influencers and entertainers to create NFTs (which Edell said will be announced at a later date).
“I felt like I was there at the beginning of social media,” Edell said. “I don’t like what’s happened to it since the MySpace days. Now I want to try to change the world and bring social back to the way it used to be.”
.

Elon Musk abandons deal to buy Twitter; company says it will sue

Elon Musk abandons deal to buy Twitter; company says it will sue

Elon Musk announced Friday that he will abandon his tumultuous $44 billion offer to buy Twitter after the company failed to provide enough information about the number of fake accounts. Twitter immediately fired back, saying it would sue the Tesla CEO to uphold the deal.
The likely unravelling of the acquisition was just the latest twist in a saga between the world’s richest man and one of the most influential social media platforms, and it may portend a titanic legal battle ahead.
Twitter could have pushed for a $1 billion breakup fee that Musk agreed to pay under these circumstances. Instead, it looks ready to fight to complete the purchase, which the company’s board has approved and CEO Parag Agrawal has insisted he wants to consummate.
In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk lawyer Mike Ringler complained that his client had for nearly two months sought data to judge the prevalence of “fake or spam” accounts on the social media platform.
“Twitter has failed or refused to provide this information. Sometimes Twitter has ignored Mr. Musk’s requests, sometimes it has rejected them for reasons that appear to be unjustified, and sometimes it has claimed to comply while giving Mr. Musk incomplete or unusable information,” the letter said. Musk also said the information is fundamental to Twitter’s business and financial performance, and is needed to finish the merger.
In response, the chair of Twitter’s board, Bret Taylor, tweeted that the board is “committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon” with Musk and “plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement. We are confident we will prevail in the Delaware Court of Chancery.” The trial court in Delaware frequently handles business disputes among the many corporations, including Twitter, that are incorporated there.

Much of the drama surrounding the deal has played out on Twitter, with Musk — who has more than 100 million followers — lamenting that the company was failing to live up to its potential as a platform for free speech.
On Friday, shares of Twitter fell 5% to $36.81, well below the $54.20 that Musk agreed to pay. Shares of Tesla, meanwhile, climbed 2.5% to $752.29. After the market closed and Musk’s letter was published, Twitter’s stock continued to decline while Tesla climbed higher.
“This is a disaster scenario for Twitter and its board,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to investors. He predicted a long court fight by Twitter to either restore the deal or get the $1 billion breakup fee.

On Thursday, Twitter sought to shed more light on how it counts spam accounts in a briefing with journalists and company executives. Twitter said it removes 1 million spam accounts each day. The accounts represent well below 5% of its active user base each quarter. To calculate how many accounts are malicious spam, Twitter said it reviews “thousands of accounts” sampled at random, using both public and private data such as IP addresses, phone numbers, location and account behaviour when active, to determine whether an account is real.
Last month, Twitter offered Musk access to its “fire hose” of raw data on hundreds of millions of daily tweets, according to multiple reports at the time, though neither the company nor Musk confirmed that.
One of the chief reasons Musk gave for his interest in taking Twitter private was his belief he could add value to the business by getting rid of its spam bots — the same problem that he’s now citing as a reason to end the deal.
“This whole process has been bizarre,” said Christopher Bouzy, founder of research firm Bot Sentinel, which tracks fake Twitter accounts used for disinformation or harassment. “He knew about this problem. It’s odd that he would use bots and trolls and inauthentic accounts as a way of getting out of the deal.”

On the other hand, Bouzy said, the letter from Musk’s legal team makes some valid critiques of Twitter’s lack of transparency, including its apparent refusal to provide Musk with the same level of internal data it offers some of its big customers.
“It just seems as if they’re hiding something,” said Bouzy, who also believes the number of fake or spam Twitter accounts is higher than what the company has reported.
Musk’s lawyer also alleged that Twitter broke the agreement when it fired two top managers and laid off a third of its talent-acquisition team. The sale agreement, he wrote, required Twitter to “seek and obtain consent” if it deviated from conducting normal business. Twitter was required to “preserve substantially intact the material components of its current business organization,” the letter said.
Musk’s flirtation with buying Twitter appeared to begin in late March. That’s when Twitter said he contacted members of its board — including co-founder Jack Dorsey — and told them he was buying up shares of the company and was interested in either joining the board, taking Twitter private or starting a competitor.
Parag Agrawal, Parag Agrawal Twitter, Indian born CEOs, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Jack Dorsey, silicon valley Jack Dorsey stepped down as chief executive of Twitter, the social media site he co-founded in 2006.
Then, on April 4, he revealed in a regulatory filing that he had became the company’s largest shareholder after acquiring a 9% stake worth about $3 billion.
At first, Twitter offered Musk a seat on its board. But six days later, Agrawal tweeted that Musk would not be joining the board after all.
His bid to buy the company came together quickly after that.
When Musk agreed to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share, he inserted a “420” marijuana reference into his price. He sold roughly $8.5 billion worth of shares in Tesla to help fund the purchase, then strengthened his commitments of more than $7 billion from a diverse group of investors including Silicon Valley heavy hitters like Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison.
Inside Twitter, Musk’s offer was met with confusion and falling morale, especially after Musk publicly criticised one of Twitter’s top lawyers involved in content-moderation decisions.
Groups opposing the takeover from the outset — including those advocating for women, minorities and LGBTQ people — cheered Friday’s news.
“Despite what Musk may claim, this deal isn’t ending because of Twitter bots or spam accounts. This deal is collapsing because of Elon Musk’s own erratic behaviour, embrace of extremists and bad business decisions,” said Angelo Carusone, president of Media Matters, a left-leaning nonprofit watchdog group that’s been critical of Musk’s Twitter bid.
Musk, he said, “made it clear that he would roll back Twitters’ community standards and safety guidelines, which would turn the platform into a fever swamp of dangerous conspiracy theories, partisan chicanery and white supremacist radicalization.”
.

Twitter might come with a slight cost for commercial, government users: Elon Musk

Twitter might come with a slight cost for commercial, government users: Elon Musk

Governments and commercial users might soon find that their tweets come with a price tag, at least that’s what new Twitter owner Elon Musk has hinted. Musk posted on his official Twitter handled that while the platform will always be free for casual users, there may be a slight cost for “commercial/government users.” He wrote in, “Ultimately, the downfall of the Freemasons was giving away their stonecutting services for nothing,” followed by, “Twitter will always be free for casual users, but maybe a slight cost for commercial/government users.”
When someone tweeted that Freemasons could not compete with ‘discount masons’, Musk replied, “Some revenue is better than none!,” which indicates he might be serious about this. Musk has long insisted that Twitter is an important part of the public discourse and that he plans to take the company private once the acquisition is over. Earlier, Reuters had reported that Musk’s business plans for Twitter included the ability to generate revenue from viral tweets. The report notes that his plans include charging a fee when a third-party website wants to quote or embed tweets from verified individuals or organisations.

The Tesla boss has also tweeted in the past about how he wants to make changes to the company’s Twitter Blue premium subscription service, which would include reducing price, banning ads, and an option to pay in the cryptocurrency dogecoin. He then deleted the tweet. He had also posted that he wanted to reduce the website’s dependence on advertising, which was deleted as well.

So clearly Musk is not joking when he says there will be a paid element to tweeting soon. The SpaceX co-founder also responded to a CNN tweet about an article which said that advocacy groups want brands to ensure that Twitter upholds content moderation policies under Musk.
“Who funds these organizations that want to control your access to information? Let’s investigate …” he wrote, replying to the tweet with the, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant.”
When someone else posted, “Few names will sure come up, like Open Source Foundation, George Soros amongst others,” Musk replied, “I will call him and ask,” referring to George Soros, who is a billionaire investor.
The SpaceX boss also took a dig at Apple responding to an article, which states that, “PayPal Helped Spur EU Antitrust Complaint Against Apple Payments.” Musk is a former PayPal founder.

“Apple’s store is like having a 30% tax on the Internet. Definitely not ok,” he wrote, adding it was, “Literally 10 times higher than it should be,” referring to the talks. Musk also replied to some Twitter shareholders saying they will try and keep as “many shareholders as legally possible in privately held Twitter!”
Check out Musk’s latest tweets

Twitter will always be free for casual users, but maybe a slight cost for commercial/government users
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 3, 2022

Who funds these organizations that want to control your access to information? Let’s investigate …https://t.co/dBFsGjOMC8
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 3, 2022

I will call him and ask
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 3, 2022

Apple’s store is like having a 30% tax on the Internet. Definitely not ok.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 3, 2022
Elon Musk’s Twitter deal was announced last Monday, April 28 and he will acquire the company for approximately $44 billion. However, the details of how he will finance this are not entirely clear at the moment. Ever since the deal was announced, Musk has continued his tweeting sprint, hinting at and talking about all sorts of changes that one can expect at the platform.
Some of his tweets have also caused backlash against Twitter employees, including its legal head Vijaya Gadde, who faced a lot of racial abuse and harassment on the platform after Musk indirectly criticised her on the platform. He later tweeted a meme mocking Gadde as well. When criticised by former Twitter CEO Dick Costolo that Musk was bullying employees, he replied saying, “What are talking about? I’m just saying Twitter needs to be politically neutral.”
Musk has also insisted that freedom of speech needs to be within the limits of the law on Twitter and he was against any censorship that went above and beyond legal limits. He has also said that the aim is to make both the far left and far right equally miserable.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘444470064056909’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
.

Should Brands Be Worried About Elon Musk’s Proposal For An Ad-free Twitter?

Should Brands Be Worried About Elon Musk’s Proposal For An Ad-free Twitter?

Elon Musk has declined a role on the board of Twitter, opening the door for the billionaire to take ownership of more of the social platform. He then went on to publicly share his musings for an advertising-free Twitter. But how much influence can he wield in shaping a new direction for the platform? Twitter’s CEO Parag Agarwal announced today (Monday, April 11) that Elon Musk had declined the opportunity to join its board, mere days after stating the opposite. The move to invite Musk to the board was widely seen as an attempt from Twitter to prevent the billionaire from buying up more than 15% of the company.

Now, however, that option appears to be back on the table, raising questions about the extent to which Musk’s plans for the company will be implemented regardless of Twitter’s pre-existing strategies.Responses to the news included skepticism about the extent to which this is a plan to boost the stock of Twitter through Musk’s performative tweeting. He has previously employed this tactic with the cryptocurrency dogecoin and even with Twitter itself. Of course this will prompt speculation that Musk is going for a full takeover, thus driving up share prices and making Musk’s stake more valuable. SEC investigation incoming. https://t.co/ARMhUnJyPB— Ian Betteridge (@ianbetteridge) April 11, 2022 Others – including Musk himself, according to his likes – seem to suggest that the Twitter board’s attempts to curb the attention-seeking billionaire’s proclivities ran counter to his stated aims for the company. Musk’s initial interest in Twitter came to a head last month when he began tweeting that the social media platform needed to change for nebulous ‘free speech’-related reasons.Social media consultant and industry analyst Matt Navarra says: “Right now, it’s incredibly hard to predict how much influence Elon Musk has – or will have – in the short and longer term. He has declined to join the board, which leads many to suspect he is keeping his options open in regards to increasing the size of his shareholding in the future. This will be concerning for Twitter and anyone who sees Elon’s moves as a threat, rather than an opportunity.“Twitter has launched a significant number of privacy and safety controls for users in recent years. The platform has also built out more comprehensive content moderation policies to tackle growing concerns about the spread of misinformation and online harassment. Elon says he’s a free speech absolutist. It’s only a matter of time before this clash of ideologies and visions for the platform becomes problematic and boils over. “Until there’s a clearer picture of exactly how much sway Elon’s multi-billion-dollar investment gives him, those nervous about his role in the company will remain anxious. And that’s probably part of the fun for Elon Musk and exactly what he wants.”Advertising in his sights Musk’s hinted-at changes to Twitter functionality would appear to fly in the face of much of what the social platform has sought to accomplish over the past few years, both commercially and culturally. It has been praised for its quick response to disinformation around the war in Ukraine, for instance, and its labelling of automated and state-affiliated accounts falls in line with that of platforms including YouTube and Facebook. Advertisers have welcomed the changes aimed at making the platform a brand-safe space. So it is unclear the extent to which Musk’s interest in curbing moderation on Twitter in the name of free speech would impact Twitter’s commercial interests. In its latest results, it shared that its total ad engagements decreased 12% year-on-year, but its cost per engagement (CPE) increased 39%. The net loss for the full year amounted to $221m, which the company ascribes to higher-than-average costs and the lingering impacts of Covid upon spending. Despite that, ad sales rose 22% overall in the fourth quarter. Musk has instead tabled a focus on ad-free subscriptions, stating: “Price should probably be ~$2/month, but paid 12 months up front & account doesn’t get checkmark for 60 days (watch for credit card chargebacks) & suspended with no refund if used for scam/spam.“And no ads. The power of corporations to dictate policy is greatly enhanced if Twitter depends on advertising money to survive.” Anthony Macro, head of display, video and social at Croud, says: “If Twitter introduced an ad-free subscription model, the impact on advertising cost would be primarily on inventory availability, impacting cost-per-engagement via increased CPMs. It’s hard to see how this wouldn’t drive advertisers away from the platform, but the hope would be that this loss in advertising revenue would be made up (and exceeded) by a smart pricing model with features that encouraged a good percentage of their active users to convert. Despite Musk’s increased stake in Twitter, it remains a private company and is therefore within its rights to impose certain limits on its platform. Previous Twitter CEOs have obviously seen the importance of this – as have their counterparts at Meta, Snap and TikTok. While this can be perceived as an attack on ‘free speech’, it is primarily a business decision and if efforts were put in place to roll back moderation it could have a negative impact on both active users’ and advertisers’ willingness to be present on the platform, and thus the value of Musk’s shares.“Average monetizable DAU (mDAU) reached 217M, up 13% y/y, driven by product improvements, as well as global conversation around current events. $TWTR pic.twitter.com/O77d6ZgOWj— Twitter Investor Relations (@TwitterIR) February 10, 2022 While it cramps a lot of Twitter’s partnerships and investments in improving the value of its ads, it does line up with some of the social platform’s focus on direct payments. In addition to experimenting with allowing users to tip or donate to other users directly, its 2021 acquisition of newsletter platform Revue was in service of developing new revenue sources for Twitter users. Navarra elaborates: “A paid ad-free option for social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter has been proposed many times in the past. However, adding such an option brings a new set of problems. “For example, the users who are most likely to pay an ad-free premium are often the most affluent and tend to generate the greatest amount of revenue for social networks. They are the high-spending user group advertisers want to reach the most. Also, to offer such an option, it’s likely Twitter would need to invest significant amounts of its resources to reconfigure its tech stack in order to switch off ads and data collection for a limited group of users paying to remove ads from their feeds.“Unless Twitter can figure out a revenue model less dependent on advertising income, an ad-free premium option could become highly disruptive. This is a challenge pretty much all social networks have wrestled with in recent years. And, as yet, not one of them has found a solution to.“Musk’s strategy of throwing spanners into the works makes it hard to predict how the whole situation will shake out. The reality, however, is that moving fast and breaking things seems to be anathema to Twitter’s slow, incremental progress towards sustainability over the past few years. .