India at 75: 16 events that impacted Indian markets between 2003 and 2014

selected

From the shift of Sensex to a free-float methodology to the great fall after global financial crisis of 2008-09, and recovery afterwards, here are 16 biggest events for stock markets from 2003 to 2014

Topics
stock markets | Indian market | Mutual Funds

1. February 1, 2003: UTI Mutual Fund is carved out of the erstwhile UTI as a Sebi-registered mutual fund. The Unit Trust of India Act, 1963, is repealed, and UTI is split into Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India (Suuti) and UTI Mutual Fund. UTI Mutual Fund is promoted by State Bank of India, LIC, Punjab National Bank and Bank of Baroda, with a combined holding of 45.2 per cent in the paid-up capital of UTI AMC.

TO READ THE FULL STORY, SUBSCRIBE NOW NOW AT JUST RS 249 A MONTH.

Key stories on business-standard.com are available to premium subscribers only.

Already a premium subscriber? LOGIN NOW

SUBSCRIBE TO INSIGHTS

selected
MONTHLY


249

Select

selected
ANNUAL


1799

Select

Best Offer
selected
SMART ANNUAL


1799

Opt for auto renewal and save Rs 300
Select

What you get on Business Standard Premium?

OR

5 ARTICLE PACK
PAY AS YOU GO


150
/for 5 articles

* Terms

  • 1. Lorem Ipsum is dummy Text
  • 2. Lorem Ipsum is dummy Text

VIEW ALL FAQs

Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor

First Published: Thu, August 11 2022. 18:00 IST !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,’https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);fbq(‘init’,’550264998751686′);fbq(‘track’,’PageView’); .

Bundled products are convenient, but may fall short of their promise

selected

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) recently directed mutual funds to stop offering bundled products. In future, even if you sign up for a long-term systematic investment plan, you will not be offered free life insurance. The financial landscape, however, is full of bundled products. Customers should study their fine print before deciding to rely on them.

TO READ THE FULL STORY, SUBSCRIBE NOW NOW AT JUST RS 249 A MONTH.

Key stories on business-standard.com are available to premium subscribers only.

Already a premium subscriber? LOGIN NOW

SUBSCRIBE TO INSIGHTS

selected
MONTHLY


249

Select

selected
ANNUAL


1799

Select

Best Offer
selected
SMART ANNUAL


1799

Opt for auto renewal and save Rs 300
Select

What you get on Business Standard Premium?

OR

5 ARTICLE PACK
PAY AS YOU GO


150
/for 5 articles

* Terms

  • 1. Lorem Ipsum is dummy Text
  • 2. Lorem Ipsum is dummy Text

VIEW ALL FAQs

Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor

First Published: Fri, July 01 2022. 20:44 IST !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,’https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);fbq(‘init’,’550264998751686′);fbq(‘track’,’PageView’); .

The Murky World Of Social Media Stock Tips

The Murky World Of Social Media Stock Tips

By December 2021, the channel garnered quite a following—of nearly 52,000 subscribers. It recommended stocks to buy and sell, particularly small cap scrips. But there was one problem. The administrators weren’t research analysts. One of them, Himanshu Patel, did a masters in tourism management and had previously worked in a hotel.

Patel, along with other administrators, was using their trading accounts to first buy the shares of certain companies and then recommend it to their subscribers. Next, they sold the shares for a neat profit, India’s market regulator found during an investigation. In an interim order passed on 12 January, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) alleged unlawful gains worth 2.84 crore. It also advised investors to stay away from such tipsters.

Bullrun2017 was running a classic ‘pump-and-dump’ scheme or one where a stock is manipulated through exaggerated recommendations. Nothing new about this except for the fact that in this case, social media was widely used in talking up penny stocks.

With Sebi cracking the whip, many other Telegram channels dedicated to recommending penny stocks were alarmed. Some of them shifted to other platforms such as Twitter. On 14 January, the admin of one such Telegram channel told its 1,585 subscribers: “Due to Sebi guidelines, I will (be) more active on Twitter …. I will update all stocks, suggestions on Twitter”.

Yet another channel which assures “great returns” with close to 2 lakh subscribers said: “Mandatory disclaimer as required by Sebi. This channel is only for educational purposes. Consult with your financial advisor before investment”.

Interestingly, there is no Sebi guideline that says stock tips and trade suggestions can be given for educational purposes. In any case, most of these channels have little educational material or any discussion on the fundamentals of stocks they recommend.

The rot goes deeper. There are instances where influencers who have considerable following on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook are approached by companies to send out social media posts recommending and endorsing their shares.

All this at a time when more and more Indians are investing in equities. According to data published by the regulator, an average of 26 lakh new demat accounts were opened every month in the year ending March 2022, as against a monthly average of 4 lakh in 2019-20. As of November 2021, the total number of investor accounts stood at 7.7 crore. The new-to-stock markets are easy prey for tipsters peddling in penny stocks.

Mint deep dived into this rabbit hole. The hole runs deep. Here, the lines between what is legal and illegal, ethical and unethical get fairly blurry.

Shades of grey

‘Buy-sell’ and ‘stock tips’ are among the most commonly searched terms on every possible social media site. If we type ‘stock tips’ on Twitter, more than a thousand handles show up.

“Social media is full of instances of how certain stocks are sold on behalf of the investment relations teams of the said companies. The stocks are hard sold through webinars, YouTube, WhatsApp, non-stop tweeting and Telegram channels,” Shyam Sekhar, chief ideator and founder of iThought, a Sebi-registered investment advisory firm, said. “These are all virtual marketing tools used to create a sense of FOMO (fear of missing out) among investors. There are many instances where investors have been caught in this trap. They end up investing at peak valuation of manipulated stocks and end up losing as much as 25%-30% of the money invested,” he added.

Mint investigated 12 stock market focused telegram channels to get a sense of how they operate.

“Invest 50,000 and get assured returns of 1.5 lakh in six months,” pinned messages in many of these groups often state.

Sebi, in the past, has frowned upon many advisors who have promised “assured returns” because this is illegal.

Another standard disclaimer in stock market channels and WhatsApp groups: “We are not Sebi registered investment advisors”. Surprisingly, this hasn’t dented their subscriber base. The admins of many Telegram channels continue to be revered for they have been able to make money in last year’s extended bull run.

“In a bull run, it is easy to make money. The real test of these mushrooming social media stock channels would be in the bear market. These telegram channels are, more often than not, front running stocks at the detriment of their subscribers. These disclaimers are traps to induce investors and avoid being caught in regulatory crosshairs,” Alok Jain, founder of Weekend Investing, another Sebi registered advisory firm, said.

One Telegram channel has over 15,000 subscribers and is run by an individual whose credentials on LinkedIn show that his real expertise lies in ‘search engine optimization’. He worked with a leading stock exchange as a junior level social media manager. On his channel, he recommends small cap stocks.

Yet another channel is run by an individual in Bihar whose experience, before 2017, was solely marketing for retail chains. Before he began giving “super HNI calls” (tips that high networth individuals use), he was the CEO of a departmental store. Currently, his firm is dolling out stock calls to 31,000 subscribers for free. He also has a premium model—for 10,000, he would advise “buying the next multi bagger stock”. Stocks that generate returns several times their costs are called multi baggers. These stocks are mostly undervalued but have strong fundamentals.

“Stock recommendations are always followed by emojis of a rocket taking off or fire. These are highly suggestive emojis that indicate a stock is ready for a take-off,” said a senior market analyst who didn’t want to be identified.

Typically, many of these stock calls are always accompanied by an increase in trading volumes.

Here are two examples. Both the stocks were recommended in at least two-three Telegram channels.

Inventure Growth and Securities, a financial services company, was recommended in January this year and the volume of shares traded increased by 3.5 times as compared to the previous month. However, in February, the volume reduced nearly by half.

Lasa Supergenerics, an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) products company, was recommended in December 2021 and in January this year. The trading volume in December increased almost three times; in January, the volume tripled from the previous month. The volume subsequently reduced almost by half in February.

Mint reached out to both Inventure Growth and Lasa Supergenerics for clarifications. Both did not respond.

Sebi regulations are clear—any investment advice against a fee needs the advisor or the advisory firm to be registered with the regulator. However, some channels have found a way around it. They recommend stocks against a nominal fee towards a social cause. “No one can verify what that social cause is, and whether the money is being used for the said social purpose,” said the market analyst quoted above.

The fin-influencers

Along with hordes of investors during the pandemic, came a new breed of financial experts. They offer advise on personal finance through the social media. Many of these experts have amassed a massive following on YouTube, Twitter and Instagram. They are popularly known as ‘fin-influencers’ or ‘money-influencers’. At times, these influencers are approached by companies to subtly push their upcoming public offerings or even give their stock prices a boost. The influencers include chartered accountants.

“I know of a well-known chartered accountant who quotes nearly 8-10 lakh for recommending stocks,” a market expert who didn’t want to be identified said.

A recent example of a scrip being pushed by influencers is allegedly that of Salasar Techno Engineering Ltd, an infrastructure construction services company. At least three financial experts who have a large following on Twitter raised concerns.

“Please be careful of Salasar….many influencers are being approached to push this in return for 25-30K,” Alok Jain of Weekend Investing tweeted on 7 March to his 1.88 lakh followers.

Shravan Venkataraman, a proprietary trader with over 17,000 followers on Twitter, claimed that a digital marketing agency contacted him for a promotional tweet on behalf of the company. “I usually promote any good tool or software, or anything useful for the followers. But this took me by surprise,” he said.

Aditya Kondawar, chief investment officer at JST Investments, a financial services company, said he has been approached quite a few times to recommend the scrip of Salasar.

Mint reached out to Salasar for clarifications multiple times—through the company’s website, and to Shashank Agarwal, the company’s joint managing director, through LinkedIn. The company didn’t respond, neither did Agarwal.

What is the regulator doing?

The markets regulator, since December last year, has conducted search and seizure operations against Telegram channel operators. Sebi has also issued multiple press releases to alert investors against misleading stock tips on social media platforms.

Barring cautionary advisories, Sebi’s crackdown has hinged on whether the admins of social media channels, or individuals giving out stock tips, have made gains. This, perhaps, gives us a sense of the nature of the beast.

“It is difficult, not just because of the scale of social media, but also because it is often difficult to distinguish between honest or wrong opinion from dishonest manipulation,” said Sandeep Parekh, managing partner, FinSec Law Advisors, a law firm.

“One should not impinge on the freedom of speech for honest but inaccurate opinion. Anyone holding shares may have a view on how his portfolio of companies are likely to do. The forecast may or may not turn out to be true. But that doesn’t automatically mean that the person is dishonest,” he added.

Going ahead, Sebi wants to establish a data lake initiative to improve surveillance. A data lake stores and processes large amounts of structured and unstructured data. This would help the regulator monitor and analyse social media posts to detect potential market manipulations.

During an event, former Sebi chief Ajay Tyagi, said: “Sebi has already planned (a) data lake project to augment analytical capability with advanced analytical tools, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, deep learning, big data analytics, pattern recognition, structured and unstructured data processing, text mining and natural language processing, and so on”.

Madhabi Puri Buch, the current chairperson of Sebi, earlier spearheaded the regulator’s Advisory Committee for Leveraging Regulatory Technology Solutions (ALeRTS).

Sebi has now formed a special team to carry out frequent search and seizure operations. Since posts on WhatsApp and Telegram channels are encrypted and data is not shared by the big tech companies with Indian regulators, scanning the mobile phones and laptops of suspected market manipulators is crucial. Sebi’s search and seizure team is working closely with consultants to develop a machine learning platform that would help scan social media posts for relevant information.

Stock exchanges, on their part, use web crawler tools to “listen” into social media chatter and posts.

“Exchanges are typically looking for terms such as ‘assured returns’, ‘money will be doubled/ tripled’. Social media posts and conversations with such terms get flagged internally for further action,” said an exchange official who didn’t want to be named.

Meanwhile, the exchanges are proactively cautioning investors to be aware.

On ‘fin-influencers’, much like the rest of the world, Sebi hasn’t firmed up its approach just yet. The only outlier is the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. The Australian regulator, earlier this month, said that paid advertisements—such as sponsored posts or traditional commercials—may constitute a violation of the law. The Australian law specifies that only licenced financial advisers are permitted to recommend financial products.

The Indian regulator has a long road ahead. And it would be interesting to watch how it regulates malpractices without impinging on free speech, a right under the Constitution.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.
Topics

.

An agent to separate the wheat from chaff

An agent to separate the wheat from chaff

The trading framework we have in place today is the outcome of efforts made by all market participants, including the regulator, the exchanges, the intermediaries, the support machinery of demat services, custodial services, banking services —the entire ecosystem. The evolution of this framework begins with one of the last laws to be passed by Parliament before Independence, the Capital Issues Control Act, which was enacted on 18 April 1947. It was about who would be in charge of capital in a socialist India: the government, through the Controller of Capital Issues (CCI).

Today’s Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) was initially set up in 1988 under an administrative arrangement. It was given statutory powers with the enactment of the Sebi Act, 1992. Capital Issues (Control) Act was repealed and the Office of CCI abolished. Control over price and premium of shares was removed; companies were now free to raise funds from securities markets after filing a letter of offer with Sebi. Sebi introduced regulations for primary and secondary market intermediaries and played a pivotal role in the development of our capital market systems, including formation of the National Stock Exchange (NSE).

In the 1990s, the Indian capital market was fragmented, with the presence of multiple stock exchanges throughout the country. A few big players including BSE and Delhi Stock Exchange had a major chunk of the country’s total trade volume. The nature of the trades was regional, with long procedures, lack of transparency and mismanagement of clients’ money. Trades in other parts were coordinated through regional brokers. Regional stock exchanges traded in stocks of local companies. Investors, who wanted stocks from BSE or Calcutta Stock Exchange had to pay in advance. However, this was also the time of liberalization and new-age economic reforms in India. The then Union government knew that attracting foreign investment was not possible in such an environment. On the recommendations of the Pherwani committee, the ministry of finance decided that there should be a nationwide electronic exchange.

The first NSE office was started at Mahindra House, Worli, Mumbai, in a room that was previously used as a canteen. NSE was the first stock exchange in the world to use VSAT for communication and connectivity. This technology resulted in middlemen losing their importance and led to cost reduction from percentage points to basis points. Today, we have zero-brokerage or near-zero brokerage trades through online brokerages, thanks to technology and system improvements.

The new exchange opened the doors for many who worked under big brokers. They could now be a member of the exchange and start their own business. In a way, NSE gave birth to a fresh ecosystem. The absence of opaque trades changed the fundamentals of trading systems, processes and costs. Many who had knowledge of the trade started investment consultancies. In the last three decades, India saw the rise of many brokerages and consultancies which communicated stock fundamentals to every nook and corner of the country. NSE was one of the first demutualized exchange in the world and the first in India. Before demutualization, exchanges were owned and operated by brokerages which resulted in conflict of interest. NSE segregated ownership, trading rights and management, eliminating conflict issues. The exchange offered membership for all, with basic eligibility criteria.

Today, NSE is the leading exchange in the country, with the lion’s share of the equity cash segment, almost the entire share of equity futures and options, and the major share of currency futures and options. Its cash market daily average turnover was 2,805 crore in 2001; this increased to 69,645 crore in 2021. In equity derivatives, the daily average turnover has increased manifold over the same period. Today NSE is the world’s largest derivatives exchange by the number of contracts traded and fourth-largest in cash equity by number of trades. By value of transactions though, it is a different story in the global picture.

Net-net, we keep on advising you, to stay away from the noise and focus on your financial goals. Similarly, the robustness of the ecosystem of our capital market is intact, with a meticulous regulator watching over; don’t mind the noise.

Joydeep Sen is a corporate trainer and author.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint.
Download
our App Now!!

.

We must correct the IPO pricing of startups with no profit record

We must correct the IPO pricing of startups with no profit record

The use of funds was the first issue addressed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi); we now have guidelines to ensure that there is no diversion of money raised. The other nagging issue was that almost half the issues had quoted at a discount post listing, which is a concern as several small investors have burnt their fingers. Should the regulator be concerned about this?

The broader question is whether issuers with records of losses for three successive years are pricing their IPOs appropriately. As a corollary, are investors being taken for a ride by merchant banks that have priced companies which are making relentless losses favourably based on some imaginary future turnover and profit numbers?

For a listed company, a share issue is transparent enough. The past can be researched before one decides whether or not the price is right. However, for several first-time issuers, which include startups, we have no past record. Companies that have made losses in the past three years cannot show performance. But they have dreams that could look like reality to investors if presented well by merchant bankers and spiced up with media interviews that make startup stories so appealing that their offer prices could be ridiculously high. This is where the regulator has a role to play.

Ever since the Controller of Capital Issues was abolished and free pricing allowed of shares, it was the market that decided pricing. Startups, however, are an enigma. They are mostly technology- driven, sell ideas in a non-conventional manner, and loosely speaking do not have fixed assets to show. They typically begin with venture capital (VC) investment. Losses pile up so high that a conventional business with such a record would close down. But these enterprises are sold to various private equity (PE) investors who find value in the enterprise, and hence their shares change hands. Originators often either move out of the business or start another venture. But they have made their money by getting a good valuation. The transaction however remains B-2-B, one with high net worth individuals operating through VC or PE funds. There is inherently no threat of market disruption.

Now, conditions have changed. The government has given an impetus to startups through an initiative that provides initial access to funds at a low rate. Startups are supposed to generate entrepreneurs and also employment. Therefore, several bright engineers and management graduates set up enterprises that sound good but can’t generate profits in the medium run. The best way out if one cannot find an investor is to go for an IPO.

The valuation is now left to an investment bank, which comes up with a number based on expected future performance. This is accepted by investors when the stock market is in a bull phase and not surprisingly gets over-subscribed. Conventional metrics like earnings-per-share, price-equity ratio and return-on-net-worth cannot be applied, as these are loss-making businesses. The market is not always lenient, however, and that is why some of these issues fail at the time of listing.

Sebi has rightly pointed out that there has to be more transparency in the valuation process and we need to have certain key performance indicators (KPI) that must be revealed. But what can these be, given that conventional financial parameters will never work for a consistently loss-making business? Here, maybe we should look at the history of the promoters in other ventures. But first-time entrepreneurs would be hard to evaluate this way.

Using a past valuation if there has been a transfer of ownership in the past is another option. But what if this was overstated to begin with? Making comparisons with startups in other geographies may again not be appropriate, as conditions vary especially for such enterprises. For example, the prospects of say a food-delivery service in India will vary from one in China or South Africa. Therefore, drawing such similarities will be tough.

One way out it to cap offer prices. The advantage here is that the market will finally decide the price, which will help investors in case there is a price rise post listing; but the promoter will feel let down as the cap would have worked against enterprise.

Another solution can be that a loss-making company issues shares in tranches. The first one could have a price cap. But after a gap of one year once the stock is listed, a second tranche can be raised the standard way without regulatory intervention as investors would by then have the company’s share price history to judge it.

Alternatively, a valuation should be done by Sebi-appointed agencies independently, with the price being revealed to the regulator separately. The advantage is that it will be an independent view and hence the conflict of interest that exists between the merchant bank and its client will be lowered. This seems like a plausible solution because the number of loss-making companies getting listed will not be too high. The issuance cost will be high for such a startup, but then, given the premium being demanded, it can be absorbed.

The third option would be to hold the proceeds in an escrow account, with the money released to promoters on the condition that projections made by the merchant bank while evaluating their business materializes, with space for a certain degree of deviation from those numbers. This will make IPO pricing more realistic.

Sebi’s discussion paper on the matter is timely, given a new situation of loss-making companies making merry at the expense of investors. Globally too, it has been found that 80% of startups fail. With overpriced IPOs, investors are left holding the can. This should stop.

These are the author’s personal views

Madan Sabnavis is chief economist, Bank of Baroda and author of ‘Hits & Misses: The Indian Banking Story’

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint.
Download
our App Now!!

.