This bank is offering ₹10 lakh insurance cover on fixed deposit

This bank is offering ₹10 lakh insurance cover on fixed deposit


DCB Bank has relaunched its DCB Suraksha Fixed Deposit, it’s a fixed 3 year FD scheme that provides an ideal combination of savings and safety for depositors as well as their dependents or loved ones. DCB Suraksha has two distinct features that distinguish it as a smart and ‘surakshit’ investment. First, it provides a high-interest rate 7.10% p.a. on a three-year deposit and, second, it offers free life insurance cover either equal to the amount of the Suraksha FD or up to Rupees 10 Lakh if the Suraksha FD amount is greater than Rupees 10 Lakh. The DCB Suraksha FD customer does not pay premium for the insurance cover. Moreover, there is no requirement for medical test to enjoy the life insurance coverage.

The regular Fixed Deposit without the Suraksha insurance is also tempting. The Bank offers an appealing 7.10% per annum interest rate on Fixed Deposit of 700 days or 3 years, that annually yields 7.49% p.a. or 7.84% p.a. respectively. Senior citizens earn 7.60% p.a. for the same duration, and the yields are 8.05% p.a. and 8.45% p.a. respectively. Furthermore, the DCB NRI Suraksha Fixed Deposit, provides NRIs with attractive returns as well as free life insurance as per the amount of the fixed deposit. Now is the ideal time to invest and make the most of high fixed deposit interest rates since the RBI has increased the repo rate by 50 basis points as of September. It has resulted in FD issuers such as banks, companies and NBFCs revising their FD rates for the better. Almost all banks give higher interest rate to senior citizens on term deposits as compared to general customers. Senior citizens depend on FD earnings to address expenses related to medical needs, daily essentials, and travel.
 

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint.
Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

More
Less

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

.

India widens overseas investment options for high net-worth individuals

India widens overseas investment options for high net-worth individuals

As per a recent report, the number of ultra-high net worth individuals (HNIs) in India stood at over 11,500 in 2021. These include first- and second-generation entrepreneurs, who are constantly looking to diversify their portfolio. Overseas Investment Regulations notified by the Reserve Bank of India on 22 August have opened new avenues for investment by HNIs outside India, and go beyond the much talked about ODI-FDI (overseas direct investment-foreign direct investment) structure relaxation. Business families in India have been setting up family offices as part of their estate and succession planning. The new regulations facilitate family offices to invest overseas.

Family offices always found it difficult to set up holding company/fund structures overseas due to the erstwhile ODI regulations which required such entities to be necessarily approved by a regulatory authority in the host country. Most developed economies (which were the jurisdiction of choice for setting up such holding company /fund) did not regulate such entities as they were using their own funds. As per new regulations, an approval is essential only if required under the host country’s laws. Further, a family office should now be able to set up a fund overseas, through its operating entity also, because under the new regulations, an Indian Entity (IE) which is not engaged in Financial Services (FS) activities is now allowed to make ODI in an entity engaged in FS (except banking and insurance) activities. Resident Individuals (RI) can purchase a house outside India out of the remittance under the Liberalised Remittance Scheme or LRS (i.e. $250,000 per annum). Practically, an RI has to pool remittances from other family members in order to acquire the house. Earlier, in such cases, the property was required to be jointly owned by all family members who have made the remittance. This created practical difficulties for HNIs to acquire their coveted overseas home. Under the new regulations, an RI can simply consolidate LRS remittances made by resident relatives to acquire a house outside India. Under the erstwhile regulations, RIs were allowed to make ODI in a foreign entity, however, Overseas Portfolio Investments (OPI) was not clearly spelled out. The new regulations have drawn a clear line of demarcation between ODI and OPI. Investment, wherein less than 10% paid-up capital and/or voting rights is acquired, by an RI in a listed entity is automatically classified as an OPI. Further, acquisition of shares under ESOP scheme resulting in acquisition of less than 10% of equity capital of a listed/unlisted foreign entity without control shall also be classified as an OPI. It may be noted that OPI is not subject to sectoral restrictions and, therefore unlike ODI, it can be in sectors such as real estate, gambling and specified financial products. It may be noted that acquisition of shares through ESOP scheme have been specifically carved out of the LRS limit and hence remittance without any limit can be made by an RI on these accounts. However, remittances made for such ESOP shall go on to reduce the LRS limit of that year. So ostensibly, you can make a remittance of say $1 million for exercising an ESOP, but you would not even be able to travel overseas in that year, as you would have exhausted your LRS limit. The regulations however do not seem to suggest a roll-forward of the excess remittance, hence the LRS limit of $250,000 should get restored in the next financial year.
For an IE, limit of ODI and OPI remains at 400% and 50% respectively of its net worth—the definition of net worth has now become empirical. Net worth was earlier defined as share capital and free reserve and did not include securities premium. The incongruity has now been removed. Now, unambiguously, limits of ODI and OPI shall be reckoned based on the ‘real’ net worth (as defined under Companies Act which includes securities premium) of a company, which would in most cases enhance the limit of overseas investments. The government has been progressively rationalizing provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act. Taking a pragmatic approach, the government has clarified certain key issues under the existing ODI framework as well. The new regulations should promote overseas investment and should expand the sphere of influence of Indian entrepreneurs globally. Vishwas Panjiar is partner at Nangia Andersen LLP. Shubham Jain, manager, Nangia Andersen LLP, contributed to this article.

Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint.
Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

More
Less

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

.

Trade settlement: Govt says banks free to not deal with sanctioned entities

Trade settlement: Govt says banks free to not deal with sanctioned entities



Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor

.

How trade can boost India’s growth

How trade can boost India’s growth

India’s exports surpassing the pre-pandemic level of $331 billion in FY 2018-19 and reaching $418 billion in FY 2021-22 is certainly an achievement. Total exports, including the services exports of around $240 billion, amount to more than $650 billion. The revival of exports has provided relief at a time when major components of aggregate demand such as consumption and investment had been slowing down. Total merchandise trade, including imports of $610 billion, amounts to $1.28 trillion for FY 2021-22. These milestones on the trade front are a sign of a rising India, which would certainly accelerate the growth and the increasing imports are a good sign given the high import intensity of India’s exports. If we sustain the momentum and capitalise on our exports’ potential, we will meet the targets of $1 trillion in merchandise exports by 2027-28 and $1 trillion in services exports by 2030, which will help achieve the $-5 trillion economy goal sooner.
The trade achievements are a sign of growing confidence in the Indian economy. The proactive policy schemes by the government — such as merchandise exports scheme, duty exemption scheme, export promotion capital goods, transport and marketing assistance scheme — have helped the export sector. Schemes like the gold card scheme and interest equalisation scheme by RBI and the market access initiative by the export promotion councils are also useful.
🚨 Limited Time Offer | Express Premium with ad-lite for just Rs 2/ day 👉🏽 Click here to subscribe 🚨
Though achievements in trade are laudable, India still has much potential. For example, the annual growth rate of India’s exports between 2011 to 2020 is a little over 1 per cent compared to 3 per cent and 4.2 per cent, respectively, for China and Bangladesh. If we go by India’s Trade Portal estimates, we find a huge difference in India’s exports potential and actual exports in many sectors, especially pharmaceuticals, gems and jewellery and chemicals. Therefore, it is time to address sector-specific and market-specific problems so that we fully capitalise on exports across sectors. For example, India’s potential in diamond and jewellery exports is close to $58 billion but actual exports are at $30 billion.Best of Express PremiumUPSC Key – May 31, 2022: Why and What to know about ‘Kareem’s’ to Jaganna...PremiumIn Rajya Sabha list, BJP sticks to OBC-Dalit winning formulaPremiumSiddaramaiah interview: ‘If polls held for local bodies without OBC...PremiumNewsmaker | Iqbal Singh Chahal: Lauded for Mumbai’s Covid fightback...Premium
To achieve the export target, India has to aggressively increase its participation in global value chains (GVCs). India’s best endowment for the next couple of decades is its working-age population and its strength is in labour-intensive manufacturing. However, the space vacated by manufacturing giants such as Japan, Korea, Malaysia and China has been captured by Vietnam, Bangladesh, Mexico and Thailand. Many of these manufacturing giants are moving away from the labour-intensive assembly of network products, which offers India an opportunity. As the Economic Survey (2019-20) suggests, “assemble in India”, particularly in network products, will increase India’s share in world exports to 6 per cent and create 80 million jobs. It is time to find out and research why MNCs are (re)locating to countries like Vietnam, Bangladesh and Mexico when India offers a big market and cheap manpower. We are yet to capitalise on “China+1 strategy”.
India also needs to work on institutions facilitating trade, processes for exports and imports and logistics that not only reduce trade and transaction costs but also ensure reliability and timely delivery, which is important to becoming part of GVCs. India’s rank in the logistics performance index is 44 while China’s rank is 26 and South Korea’s 25. The unit cost of a container of exports is significantly higher for India compared to China, South Korea and others, thereby reducing the price competitiveness of India’s exports.

Recently, the Niti Aayog, in partnership with the Institute of Competitiveness, prepared the Export Preparedness Index (EPI) 2021 for Indian states. There are wide variations in the EPI index, which is based on trade policy, business ecosystem, export ecosystem and performance. It’s time to focus on the first three of these input pillars in states whose scores are below the national average. State-level reforms in reducing red tape and complex laws including taxation will go a long way. One way to reduce the complexities of trade and business is by signing free trade agreements. These not only reduce tariffs and give market access but bring down non-tariff barriers such as administrative fees, labelling requirements, anti-dumping duties and countervailing measures. It’s a good sign that Delhi recently concluded FTAs with the UAE, and Australia and is negotiating with the UK, GCC and Canada. Though FTAs may not necessarily help the trade balance immediately, they help in streamlining policies.
Along with the merchandise exports, India should focus on services exports. As per the Ministry of Commerce (MoC), services exports are expected to reach the target of $1 trillion before the deadline of 2030. India has done well in IT and IES exports and it can accelerate services exports in other categories including travel and tourism and business, commercial and financial services. However, the services sector needs government support.
The acceleration of merchandise and services exports could potentially make the Indian economy a $5-trillion economy sooner provided we are proactive in policies to capitalise on our exports potential, explore new markets and curb protectionism. There are also opportunities arising out of geo-political conflicts and the intention of the world to diversify its supply chain portfolio. India should capitalise on the “China+1” strategy. However, we must avoid protectionism and inverted duty structures which may give temporary relief to domestic industries but will affect India’s overall competitiveness.
(Sahoo is professor, and Mujtaba is research analyst, at the Institute of Economic Growth (IEG), Delhi)

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘444470064056909’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
.