Florida A&M Students Sue State, Accusing It of Decades of Underfunding

Florida A&M Students Sue State, Accusing It of Decades of Underfunding

The State of Florida has deliberately and systematically maintained a racially segregated higher-education structure by giving more funding to predominantly white universities than to historically Black institutions, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday on behalf of six Florida A&M University students.The suit, which seeks class-action status, was filed in federal court against the State of Florida, the Board of Governors for the State University System of Florida, and the system’s chancellor, Marshall M. Criser III. The suit demands that Florida “commit to complete parity in its support of HBCUs and traditionally white institutions within five years.”Florida A&M, with more than 9,000 students, is one of the nation’s largest HBCUs.

The financial-aid office said it ran out of state funding and had no more to give out.

The lawsuit is the latest in a string of court challenges to state funding practices that have shortchanged HBCUs by billions of dollars. Many involve the disparate treatment of land-grant universities. The 1862 Morrill Act set up a system in which the federal government provides grants to universities dedicated to agriculture, science, engineering, and related disciplines, as long as the amount is matched by nonfederal money. That usually comes from the state. But over the years, predominantly white universities have been more likely than historically Black institutions to get the share of state matching funds that they’re entitled to.Similar discrepancies are clear, the lawsuit says, in the amount of money the state provides, per student, to Florida’s two land-grant colleges. Between 1987 and 2020, the difference amounted to $1.3 billion, the complaint says. .A spokeswoman for the State University System of Florida said it does not comment on pending litigation.The complaint also points out several areas where Florida A&M gets less state funding than Florida State University, a predominantly white institution also located in Tallahassee.

Britney Denton.

Courtesy of Britney DentonBritney Denton, a pharmacy student, is a plaintiff in the case against the Florida system.

Britney Denton, a first-year doctor of pharmacy student at Florida A&M, is one of the plaintiffs. She said in an interview that she considers it unfair that two institutions “literally on opposite sides of a railroad track” have such different resources available to them. When she tried over the summer to get financial aid to enroll this fall, she said, “The financial-aid office said it ran out of state funding and had no more to give out.” She took out loans and dipped deep into savings — steps she doesn’t think she’d have to take in a better-funded university.The lawsuit accuses the state, and its university system, of unnecessarily duplicating programs at Florida A&M, making it hard for the historically Black university to attract students and faculty members. That was an issue in a successful lawsuit against the State of Maryland, which last year agreed to provide $577 million in additional funding to the state’s four HBCUs over 10 years.In 1998, Florida and the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights entered into a five-year partnership to improve access for minority students at all levels of education. The lawsuit contends that the state failed to live up to that agreement.Raymond C. Pierce, president of the Southern Education Foundation, was serving in the Office for Civil Rights when that agreement was signed. He said on Thursday that while he hadn’t yet read the Florida complaint, he found it “unfortunate and sad” that such challenges are necessary. Pierce, a longtime civil-rights lawyer who has been a key player in numerous challenges to state funding for HBCUs, said he oversaw the drafting of the partnership agreement, aimed at fixing decades-long problems of segregation and discrimination, that Florida is accused of violating.“State budgets get tight — I understand that, and you have competing interests,” said Pierce. But too often, he added, the interests of the predominantly white university win out. “The idea that Black students don’t deserve or require the educational services other students need,” he said, “are racist notions that haven’t gone away.”
.

Commentary: HDB buyback scheme shows the premium Singapore places on racial harmony

Commentary: HDB buyback scheme shows the premium Singapore places on racial harmony

The figure is consistent with recent data from the Ministry of National Development, and Mr Lee used this to illustrate why the EIP is necessary to prevent the formation of racial enclaves.

But homeowners might experience a different aspect of the policy: After the EIP quota is reached, homeowners can only sell their flat to another member of the same race, which tends to create difficulties for minority sellers.

Specifically, housing resale prices in Chinese-constrained areas, such as Bishan, are usually more expensive. Minority sellers in these neighbourhoods tend to take a longer time, at least a year longer for some sellers, to find another minority buyer willing to meet the higher evaluation price. This commonly results in a significantly lower resale price, sometimes more than S$50,000, and is a source of frustration for non-Chinese sellers, to say the least. 

Sellers in such circumstances had previously been supported by giving them more time to sell their flat or waiving the EIP limits in exceptional circumstances.

This new buyback scheme is a significant move to smoothen some of the EIP’s rough edges, but it remains to be seen how implementation will be. The Government will offer a “fair price” after sellers demonstrate a concerted effort over a period to sell the flat at a “reasonable asking price”. For a start, the buyback sum and the assessment of the seller’s resale attempts may be contested, as it may not necessarily be based on the valuation price or reach complete parity with other home resale transactions.

Importantly, the scheme will not eliminate the innate propensity for racial or class segregation. Even with the buyback scheme in place, neighbourhoods that draw homebuyers from specific racial or income groups will continue to attract these buyers for the same reasons, such as the desire to live near to one’s relatives or to live within proximal range of certain primary schools for enrolment advantage.  .