Life insurers may get to sell health covers

Life insurers may get to sell health covers

An internal committee of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) has been discussing the proposal over the past few weeks, and the regulator is likely to issue draft guidelines allowing life insurers to sell indemnity health insurance products (commonly known as mediclaim policies), said the two people, both of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity since the rules are yet to be formalized.

Cover to coverView Full ImageCover to cover

“Life insurance companies inherently get more customers than health insurers in the retail space, which will help them get more people covered under medical insurance at more affordable premiums,” one of the two people cited above said.
According to India’s Economic Survey 2021-22, life insurance penetration in the country stood at 3.2% in 2020, rising from 2.82% in 2019. However, the penetration of overall non-life insurance (which includes health insurance, motor insurance, fire and industrial insurance) is abysmally low at 1%, way behind the global average of 4.1%.
“With captive customers, larger distribution networks and higher disposable cash, life insurers are well-positioned to offer health insurance products to a larger population at better rates,” said the second person.
Life insurers in India have at least 2.5 million individual agents, tie-ups with over 500 corporate agents, a huge bancassurance channel, a large network of brokers, and thousands of their own physical branches where they sell insurance policies. Therefore, Irdai’s move may not only help enhance the penetration of health insurance in the country, but also raise competition among health insurers .
“Initially, to be able to encourage more customers, life insurers may offer health insurance policies whose premium could be 5-10% lower than the average price of basic health insurance policies offered by non-life insurers at present,” said the first person.

Initially, Irdai may allow life insurers either to sell existing mediclaim products of other companies, or allow them to both design and distribute mediclaim policies.
Once life insurers are allowed to design, price and sell mediclaim products, the primary competition will be between life and health insurers, which may lead to a friendlier premium regime for retail customers.
An email sent Irdai remained unanswered
Currently, basic mediclaim products for a sum insured of 2 lakh cost an annual premium of 5,000-7,000 for an adult individual without any pre-existing ailment and aged 18-50. This premium range may get lowered by 5-10% once Irdai allows life insurers to design and sell mediclaim products.
Health insurance accounts for 33% of total non-life industry premium. In FY22, health insurance premium totalled 73,578 crore.
Tarun Chugh, managing director and CEO of Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co. Ltd. said, “The confirmation on this (Irdai’s) proposal is awaited. As an industry, we (life insurers) have all the tenets in place to commence selling health insurance as soon as the signal comes in.”
“Considering our distribution network, underwriting skills, agile processes and technology, the (life insurance) industry can leverage these pillars to take the advantages of health insurance to different customer segments. It will be a win-win for all,” said Chugh.
According to Amit Palta, chief distribution officer at ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co., India’s largest private life insurer in terms of assets, once life insurers are allowed to sell health insurance, getting into health business won’t be tough. Life insurance business too is about pricing ‘risks’ to provide protection, and more importantly, the end customer for both life and health insurance is essentially the same policyholder.
“However, there will be a requirement to build the requisite infrastructure to support indemnity claims to support customers so that the experience stays seamless. As an opportunity, this still is huge since India is under-penetrated on protection, and almost 70% of health-related expenses are still happening largely from out-of-pocket, depleting people’s savings. There is no doubt that adoption of health as a product is definitely required in the country.”
“Life insurers will be able to add one more product to their portfolio and reach out to the customer with a more well-rounded protection proposition. Including health within life insurance will improve the industry’s overall ability to take health protection to a larger set of the population. Apart from mortality, we can look at morbidity also, as a liability that can easily add to our assessment for medical products. It adds value, if we were to be allowed to take health indemnity products to the end customers,” said Palta.
In 2016, the insurance regulator had barred life insurance firms from offering indemnity-based health products either to individuals or as a group policy. However, after receiving representations from the industry, Irdai formed a committee to look into the feasibility of offering such policies again.
Even though the move may usher in a new business opportunity for life insurers, the key challenge for life players will be pricing health insurance products, creating a large enough hospital network for smoother settlements, and matching the claim processing capabilities that standalone health insurers have.
“Actuarial task will be crucial as under-pricing may lead to steep losses and over-pricing may fend off customers,” said the second person. This will be critical because by nature, life insurance policies have long gestation periods, lower claim frequency and better earnings prospects.
On the other hand, health insurance, by nature, causes cash-burn for insurers in the initial years due to high claim frequency and short duration of their validity to enable insurers gain from the premium paid by the customer.
Only if a policy remains claim-free during a given year, the health insurer is able to make money. But, even if 20- 30% of a health product’s customers raise claims in a year, the policy creates losses for the insurer as claim settlement amount is significantly higher than the premium paid.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.


.

Irdai eases capital requirement for insurers to offer PMJJBY schemes

Irdai eases capital requirement for insurers to offer PMJJBY schemes

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) has reduced the capital required to be held by insurance companies offering Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) by almost 50 per cent to enable insurers to offer more policies under the scheme, and provide financial security to bottom of the pyramid of Indian population.

“In order to facilitate more participation of insurers in PMJJBY, Irdai has reduced the capital required to be held by insurers offering PMJJBY, by almost 50 per cent”, the insurance regulator said in a statement on Friday.

PMJJBY provides life insurance cover worth Rs 2 lakh to all account holders aged 18-50 years.ALSO READ – Govt raises premium for flagship insurance schemes PMJJBY, PMSBY

This move by the insurance regulator comes after the Centre increased the premium rates for PMJJBY and Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY), for the first time in seven years due to “long-standing adverse claims experience”, and to make them economically viable. The premium for PMJJBY would increase from Rs 330 to Rs 436 a year effective June 1, and the PMSBY premium would rise from Rs 12 to Rs 20.

This step by Irdai will supplement the recent revision of premium rates by the government of India for the two flagship schemes – PMJJBY and PMSBY — to make these schemes economically viable.

“The easing of capital requirements by Irdai will accelerate the penetration of life insurance in India, and will support the life insurers in achieving the target set by the Government”, Irdai said.

Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,’https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);fbq(‘init’,’550264998751686′);fbq(‘track’,’PageView’); .

Irdai Directs Insurers To Stop Displaying Assistance Services Ads Not Related To Insurance Claims

Irdai Directs Insurers To Stop Displaying Assistance Services Ads Not Related To Insurance Claims

NEW DELHI:The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai) has advised motor insurers to discontinue advertisements not related to insurance claims as may be provided by motor garages/workshops. 

Typically, general insurance companies enter into service agreements with motor workshops/garages for the purpose of providing motor insurance claim services for repair of accident vehicles. It has been noticed that the service agreements in addition to claim services, extend certain assistance services not related to insurance claims such as free pick up and drop of vehicle, body wash, interior cleaning, inspection of vehicle etc.

Irdai said while the bundling of the above facilities with insurance is left to the motor service providers, general insurers issuing advertisements on the said services, projecting them as benefits provided within the insurance cover is unacceptable. “The main objective of service agreements with motor garages/workshops shall only be providing insurance services for claims of accident vehicles and it cannot arbitrarily expand to include scope of services which are not relevant for insurance claims,” said Irdai.

It added that a perusal of advertisements issued by a few general insurers showing discounts up to certain percent, saving in the premium etc., and the illustrations provided therein, reveals that the features or benefits are applicable under extreme or exceptional scenarios. The discounts in certain advertisements are not shown objectively on filed rates but expressed in comparison to rates of erstwhile tariff. This is not to be done. “Considering that the quoting of motor premium rates is dependent upon multiple factors and a variety of risks, the contents of the said advertisements which may be applicable under extreme or exceptional scenarios would make a large number of prospective customers vulnerable to wrong understanding, said Irdai.

Hence, the regulator advised insurers to do the following:

To discontinue the advertisements in respect of the services not related to insurance claims as may be provided by motor garages/workshops.

To stop displaying discounts with reference or comparison to rates of erstwhile tariff.

To ensure that the discounts and saving in the premium which may be applicable only under extreme or exceptional scenarios shall not be displayed as examples.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

.

New business premium income of insurance cos up 13% at Rs 3.14 trn in FY22

New business premium income of insurance cos up 13% at Rs 3.14 trn in FY22

New business premium income of all the life insurance companies rose by nearly 13 per cent to Rs 3,14,263 crore in fiscal 2022, data from Irdai showed on Monday.

Twenty four life insurance companies had a total premium income of Rs 2,78,277.98 crore from new business in the previous fiscal.

Soon-to-be listed public sector insurance behemoth LIC registered about 8 per cent growth in its new business premium income at Rs 1,98,759.85 crore in 2021-22, against Rs 1,84,174.57 crore in the previous fiscal, as per the data shown by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Irdai).

The rest of the 23 life insurance companies belonging to the private sector had a combined new business premium of Rs 1,15,503.15 crore during the fiscal, up 23 per cent from Rs 94,103.42 crore.

In terms of market share, LIC commanded 63.25 per cent of the market and the rest of 36.75 per cent by the 23 private entities, as per Irdai data.(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

.

India must look at uniformity of insurance

India must look at uniformity of insurance

The regulator, probably for the first time, acknowledged the problem of choice the common man was exposed to. When customers go looking for insurance for their family, they are flooded with an endless number of products with each having its own unique features.

The motive behind the standardization of policies was simple. Let’s have insurance products with standardized wordings designed by the regulator. Customers wouldn’t get overwhelmed with fancy products and their fancier benefits and drop out. They could simply compare prices among brands and cover their basic healthcare risks.

Two years down, when our research team at Beshak went to check the success of these products, they found the adoption rate for such standardized products to be dismal. Especially long-term products like term life and health insurance, where customers commit big premiums for the long term, in most cases for their lifetime.

A quick dipstick check by Beshak on toll-free numbers of leading insurers was enough to figure that these plans are not being offered or even mentioned when one inquires about health or life insurance. Only when our team specifically demanded these policies was there a reluctant mention of these products.

The situation is even trickier when it comes to term life insurance. IRDAI has not only mandated a standardized product but also removed many key underwriting restrictions that were an integral part of the products on offer so far. So, while many insurers are displaying this product online, our research found that they are being sold at a premium that is 50% higher than that of a regular term life insurance plan.

Why did standardized products not work?

My observation from more than 15 years of experience in this space is that the distribution-driven insurance industry is simply resistant to the plain commoditization of products.

Commoditization of products would simply mean commoditization of the brand. Sales based on standard products would be primarily price-driven, which will only bring down the margin and profitability of large brands that command a premium today.

Successful standardization of products is also likely to make many distribution channels redundant. There would hardly be any “sales” involved – thus probably reducing the distribution margins too.

Insurers are, in fact, under constant pressure to benchmark their product with the latest ones in the market and stay relevant to distributors. As per our check on the IRDAI portal, there have been 19 new products and 75 product revamps filed only in retail health insurance in the last year alone.

The problem continues

The problem of complexity, the regulator originally wanted to solve, hence remains. As a research platform, we are constantly scrutinizing insurance policies. Our team finds it arduous to compare policies and their often twisted wordings.

We just can’t imagine a customer being able to find the time and inclination to compare and comprehend the differences in the various insurance policies.

For instance, comparing the reinstatement benefit in health insurance can be a frustrating experience. There are probably an equal number of variations in the restoration benefits as there are products. Every product, even two products from the same insurer, could have different restoration benefits.

Another case in point is the definition of permanent disability as a rider in different life policies.

The three top life insurance policies that we picked up had varied definitions for total permanent disability. For instance, one insurer defines disability in terms of the capacity to perform activities like mobility, bending, etc, while another insurer defined the ‌same rider in terms of disability of a certain part of the body.

On one hand, the world is moving towards simplification of products and experience, and on the other hand, the insurance industry is caught in a vicious war of features and benefits that only puts off a serious customer.

Standardization efforts need a 2.0 version!

Now that the new chairperson has joined IRDAI, we think the regulator should focus on the standardization of definitions instead of standardizing entire products. This would be a much better win-win solution on the ground for both the industry and the customers.

Standardizing all core offerings and conditions in the product across insurers can dramatically reduce the anxiety and the pain the end consumer goes through in understanding and comparing complex insurance products, thus help‌ing faster, well-informed decisions from customers, which is the ultimate goal of every stakeholder in this industry.

Mahavir Chopra is founder & CEO at Beshak.org.

Subscribe to Mint Newsletters * Enter a valid email * Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter.

Never miss a story! Stay connected and informed with Mint.
Download
our App Now!!

.