Google to Make Account Login Mandatory for New Fitbit Users in 2023

Google to Make Account Login Mandatory for New Fitbit Users in 2023

Fitbit Google Account
Wearable technology company Fitbit has announced a new clause that requires users to switch to a Google account “sometime” in 2023.
“In 2023, we plan to launch Google accounts on Fitbit, which will enable use of Fitbit with a Google account,” the Google-owned fitness devices maker said.
CyberSecurity
The switch will not go live for all users in 2023. Rather, support for Fitbit accounts is expected to continue until at least the beginning of 2025, after which a Google account will be mandatory for using the devices.
The deeper integration also means that a Google account will be compulsory to sign up for Fitbit and activate new features, including those that incorporate Google products and services such as Google Assistant.
Also necessitated as part of the transition is the consent from the part of users to move their personal data from Fitbit to Google. The internet giant stressed that users’ personal information will not be used to serve ads.
The goal, Fitbit said, is to include a “single login for Fitbit and other Google services, industry-leading account security, centralized privacy controls for Fitbit user data, and more features from Google on Fitbit.”
CyberSecurity
The development comes more than three years after Google announced similar changes in May 2019 post its acquisition of smart home company Nest.
In January 2021, when Google completed its Fitbit acquisition, the company said the “deal has always been about devices, not data,” and that it “will protect Fitbit users’ privacy.”

//e&&!t&&(jQuery.ajax({url:”https://thehackernews.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json&max-results=4″,type:”get”,cache:!1,dataType:”jsonp”,success:function(e){for(var t=””,s=””,r=0;r
.

Why Zero Trust Should be the Foundation of Your Cybersecurity Ecosystem

Why Zero Trust Should be the Foundation of Your Cybersecurity Ecosystem

Zero Trust
For cybersecurity professionals, it is a huge challenge to separate the “good guys” from the “villains”. In the past, most cyberattacks could simply be traced to external cybercriminals, cyberterrorists, or rogue nation-states. But not anymore.
Threats from within organizations – also known as “insider threats” – are increasing and cybersecurity practitioners are feeling the pain.
Traditional perimeter defenses are not designed to prevent these attacks. They also struggle to keep external attackers out. Clever hackers continuously find ways in and “weaponize” their trusted status inside the network to compromise sensitive assets and orchestrate larger attacks.
And an increasing number of enterprise resources – applications, devices, data, and even people – now live outside the perimeter. It’s difficult to protect these assets with legacy approaches, much less fortify the perimeter to keep attackers out completely.
How can you protect your organization in this landscape?
The answer: Adopt a zero trust approach to cybersecurity.
Of course, this is easier said than done. That’s why Cynet has created a free eBook called “Implementing zero trust: Key considerations before you begin” for you. The guide explains how your organization can design a zero trust implementation strategy, select an appropriate methodology, assemble the right tools, and execute the implementation plan for successful zero trust adoption.
What is Zero Trust?
The traditional perimeter relies on a “trust but verify” approach where all users and endpoints are automatically trusted once they are “in” the network. But as we have seen, this method creates serious security risks, both from malicious internal actors and from external actors compromising legitimate credentials.
Zero trust aims to eliminate this risk with its “trust nothing, verify everything” approach. It involves continuously monitoring and validating the privileges of each user and device along with vetting all access requests before allowing that user or device to access an enterprise asset.
The Growth of Zero Trust
Recently, zero trust has developed a large following due to a surge in insider attacks and an increase in remote work – both of which challenge the effectiveness of traditional perimeter-based security approaches.
A 2021 global enterprise survey found that 72% respondents had adopted zero trust or planned to in the near future. Gartner predicts that spending on zero trust solutions will more than double to $1.674 billion between now and 2025.
Governments are also mandating zero trust architectures for federal organizations. These endorsements from the largest organizations have accelerated zero trust adoption across every sector. Moreover, these developments suggest that zero trust will soon become the default security approach for every organization.
Should You Adopt Zero Trust?
Zero trust enables organizations to protect their assets by reducing the chance and impact of a breach. It also reduces the average breach cost by at least $1.76 million, can prevent five cyber disasters per year, and save an average of $20.1 million in application downtime costs.
However, deciding to embrace zero trust is much easier than actually implementing it. For many organizations, the transition process can be both overwhelming and labor-intensive. “Implementing zero trust: Key considerations before you begin” can help reduce the intimidation factor and simplify the approach to a zero trust deployment.
New eBook Helps You Implement Zero Trust
The Cynet zero trust eBook walks through the core concepts and principles of zero trust. It highlights the key considerations you should be aware of during implementation, including:

  • How can you design the implementation strategy and select the best methodology?
  • How should you update your existing security stack?
  • Which security policies, protocols, and tools do you need?
  • What is the best way to execute an implementation plan?
  • And finally, how can extended detection and response (XDR) strengthen your Zero Trust ecosystem?

The eBook serves as a guide to answer all these questions and discusses how pairing zero trust with an extended detection and response (XDR) platform can provide a far greater fabric of security than using either one alone.
By combining multiple defenses such as threat prevention, detection, and automated response, XDR provides a strong foundation to a zero trust strategy.
Zero trust is possible without XDR. But with XDR, it’s much harder for bad actors to breach your systems or compromise your mission-critical assets.
If you are considering a zero trust implementation, or are currently deploying one, this eBook was written for you.
Download Implementing zero trust: Key considerations before you begin.

//e&&!t&&(jQuery.ajax({url:”https://thehackernews.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json&max-results=4″,type:”get”,cache:!1,dataType:”jsonp”,success:function(e){for(var t=””,s=””,r=0;r
.

Record DDoS Attack with 25.3 Billion Requests Abused HTTP/2 Multiplexing

Record DDoS Attack with 25.3 Billion Requests Abused HTTP/2 Multiplexing

DDoS HTTP/2 Multiplexing
Cybersecurity company Imperva has disclosed that it mitigated a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack with a total of over 25.3 billion requests on June 27, 2022.
The “strong attack,” which targeted an unnamed Chinese telecommunications company, is said to have lasted for four hours and peaked at 3.9 million requests per second (RPS).
“Attackers used HTTP/2 multiplexing, or combining multiple packets into one, to send multiple requests at once over individual connections,” Imperva said in a report published on September 19.
The attack was launched from a botnet that comprised nearly 170,000 different IP addresses spanning routers, security cameras, and compromised servers located in more than 180 countries, primarily the U.S., Indonesia, and Brazil.
CyberSecurity
The disclosure also comes as web infrastructure provider Akamai said it fielded a new DDoS assault aimed at a customer based in Eastern Europe on September 12, with attack traffic spiking at 704.8 million packets per second (pps).

The same victim was previously targeted on July 21, 2022, in a similar fashion in which the attack volume ramped up to 853.7 gigabits per second (Gbps) and 659.6 million pps over a period of 14 hours.
Akamai’s Craig Sparling said the company has been “bombarded relentlessly with sophisticated distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks,” indicating that the offensives could be politically motivated in the face of Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine.

Both the disruptive attempts were UDP flood attacks where the attacker targets and overwhelms arbitrary ports on the target host with User Datagram Protocol (UDP) packets.
CyberSecurity
UDP, being both connectionless and session-less, makes it an ideal networking protocol for handling VoIP traffic. But these same traits can also render it more susceptible to exploitation.
“Without an initial handshake to ensure a legitimate connection, UDP channels can be used to send a large volume of traffic to any host,” NETSCOUT says.
“There are no internal protections that can limit the rate of a UDP flood. As a result, UDP flood DoS attacks are exceptionally dangerous because they can be executed with a limited amount of resources.”

//e&&!t&&(jQuery.ajax({url:”https://thehackernews.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json&max-results=4″,type:”get”,cache:!1,dataType:”jsonp”,success:function(e){for(var t=””,s=””,r=0;r
.

Rockstar Games Confirms Hacker Stole Early Grand Theft Auto VI Footage

Rockstar Games Confirms Hacker Stole Early Grand Theft Auto VI Footage

Rockstar Games
American video game publisher Rockstar Games on Monday revealed it was a victim of a “network intrusion” that allowed an unauthorized party to illegally download early footage for the Grand Theft Auto VI.
“At this time, we do not anticipate any disruption to our live game services nor any long-term effect on the development of our ongoing projects,” the company said in a notice shared on its social media handles.
CyberSecurity
The company said that the third-party accessed “confidential information from our systems,” although it’s not immediately clear if it involved any other data beyond the game footage.
The trove of data, contains some 90 videos of clips from the game, leaked over the weekend on GTAForums by a user with an alias “teapotuberhacker,” hinting that the party is also the same person responsible for the recent Uber breach.
Rockstar Games
The Uber hacker, who is going by the name Tea Pot, is believed to be an 18-year-old teenager. No other details are known yet.
CyberSecurity
“These videos were downloaded from Slack,” teapotuberhacker said in one of the forum messages. This also likely means that the threat actor resorted to the same technique multi-factor authentication (MFA) bombing to get past extra account security layers.
The hacker’s ultimate goal appears to be to “negotiate a deal” with the company. “I will leak more if Rockstar/Take2 doesn’t pay me,” the leaker posted in a message on 4chan.

//e&&!t&&(jQuery.ajax({url:”https://thehackernews.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json&max-results=4″,type:”get”,cache:!1,dataType:”jsonp”,success:function(e){for(var t=””,s=””,r=0;r
.

Uber Blames LAPSUS$ Hacking Group for Recent Security Breach

Uber Blames LAPSUS$ Hacking Group for Recent Security Breach

Uber LAPSUS$ Hackers
Uber on Monday disclosed more details related to the security incident that happened last week, pinning the attack on a threat actor it believes is affiliated to the notorious LAPSUS$ hacking group.
“This group typically uses similar techniques to target technology companies, and in 2022 alone has breached Microsoft, Cisco, Samsung, NVIDIA, and Okta, among others,” the San Francisco-based company said in an update.
The financially-motivated extortionist gang was dealt a huge blow in March 2022 when the City of London Police moved to arrest seven suspected LAPSUS$ gang members aged between 16 and 21. Weeks later, two of them were charged for their actions.
The hacker behind the Uber breach, an 18-year-old teenager who goes by the moniker Tea Pot, has also claimed responsibility for breaking into video game maker Rockstar Games over the weekend.
CyberSecurity
Uber said it’s working with “several leading digital forensics firms” as the company’s investigation into the incident continues, in addition to coordinating with the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Justice Department on the matter.
As for how the attack unfolded, the ridesharing firm said an “EXT contractor” had their personal device compromised with malware and their corporate account credentials stolen and sold on the dark web, corroborating an earlier report from Group-IB.
The Singapore-headquartered company, the previous week, noted that at least two of Uber’s employees located in Brazil and Indonesia were infected with Raccoon and Vidar information stealers.
“The attacker then repeatedly tried to log in to the contractor’s Uber account,” the company said. “Each time, the contractor received a two-factor login approval request, which initially blocked access. Eventually, however, the contractor accepted one, and the attacker successfully logged in.”
Upon gaining a foothold, the miscreant is said to have accessed other employee accounts, thereby equipping the malicious party with elevated permissions to “several internal systems” such as Google Workspace and Slack.
The company further said it took a number of steps as part of its incident response measures, including disabling impacted tools, rotating keys to the services, locking down codebase, and also blocking compromised employee accounts from accessing Uber systems or alternatively issuing a password reset for those accounts.
Uber didn’t disclose how many employee accounts were potentially compromised, but it reiterated that no unauthorized code changes were made and that there was no evidence the hacker had access to production systems that support its customer-facing apps.
That said, the alleged teen hacker is said to have downloaded some unspecified number of internal Slack messages and information from an in-house tool used by its finance team to manage certain invoices.
Uber also confirmed that the attacker accessed HackerOne bug reports, but noted that “any bug reports the attacker was able to access have been remediated.”
“There is only one solution to making push-based [multi-factor authentication] more resilient and that is to train your employees, who use push-based MFA, about the common types of attacks against it, how to detect those attacks, and how to mitigate and report them if they occur,” Roger Grimes, data-driven defense evangelist at KnowBe4, said in a statement.
Chris Clements, vice president of solutions architecture at Cerberus Sentinel, said it’s crucial for organizations to realize that MFA is not a “silver bullet” and that not all factors are created equal.
CyberSecurity
While there has been a shift from SMS-based authentication to an app-based approach to mitigate risks associated with SIM swapping attacks, the attack against Uber and Cisco highlights that security controls once considered infallible are being bypassed by other means.
The fact that threat actors are banking on attack paths such as adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) proxy toolkits and MFA fatigue (aka prompt bombing) to trick an unsuspecting employee into inadvertently handing over MFA codes or authorizing an access request signals the need to adopt phishing-resistant methods.
“To prevent similar attacks, organizations should move to more secure versions of MFA approval such as number matching that minimize the risk of a user blindly approving an authentication verification prompt,” Clements said.
“The reality is that if an attacker only needs to compromise a single user to cause significant damage, sooner or later you are going to have significant damage,” Clements added, underscoring strong authentication mechanisms “should be one of many in-depth defensive controls to prevent compromise.”

//e&&!t&&(jQuery.ajax({url:”https://thehackernews.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=json&max-results=4″,type:”get”,cache:!1,dataType:”jsonp”,success:function(e){for(var t=””,s=””,r=0;r
.