Australia’s AGL Energy rebuffs sweetened $4 bln bid from Brookfield-led team

Australia’s AGL Energy rebuffs sweetened $4 bln bid from Brookfield-led team

AGL Energy’s Liddell coal-fired power station is pictured in the Hunter Valley, north of Sydney, Australia, April 9, 2017. REUTERS/Jason ReedRegister now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegister

  • New offer pitched at 15% premium to pre-bid price
  • AGL says demerger offers better value to shareholders
  • AGL shares slip but hold above pre-bid price

MELBOURNE, March 7 (Reuters) – Australia’s AGL Energy confirmed on Monday it rejected a sweetened A$5.4 billion ($4.0 billion) takeover proposal from tech billionaire Mike Cannon-Brookes and Canada’s Brookfield Asset Management (BAMa.TO), saying it still undervalued Australia’s top power producer.Brookfield and Cannon-Brookes said they had walked away, leaving AGL to pursue plans to split its coal-fired power business from its energy retail business. AGL is Australia’s biggest carbon emitter and the consortium had planned to speed up the closure of its coal-fired power plants.”We are no longer engaged,” a Brookfield spokesperson said, declining to comment further.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterThe revised proposal was pitched at A$8.25 a share, a 15% premium to AGL’s share price on Feb. 18, ahead of a first surprise approach from the Brookfield-led consortium at A$7.50 a share. The premium above AGL’s close last Friday.AGL’s shares fell 1.2% to A$7.34 on Monday but stayed above their pre-bid price.AGL is looking to split into two companies called Accel and AGL Australia following a 75% slump in the group’s value over the past five years, hammered by an influx of cheap solar and wind power and government pressure on utilities to slash power prices to households.Chief Executive Graeme Hunt said the demerged businesses would both have growth prospects in the shift to cleaner energy, with the biggest energy retail customer base in AGL Australia and valuable energy sites with 2.7 gigawatts of projects in the Accel business.”We see that the combined value of both entities is higher than the value of the company as it stands today, but none of that has been reflected in the offer that we received,” Hunt told Reuters.Cannon-Brookes said on Twitter the demerger path “was a terrible outcome for shareholders, taxpayers, customers, Australia and the planet we all share”.Fund managers who have shunned AGL’s shares over the past few years said it was hard to put a value on its demerger plan in a market that faces a range of challenges in the energy transition.Morgan Stanley raised its price target AGL to A$7.50 from A$6.88 on Friday and said there was potential for a 25% to 30% rise in a scenario in which all its coal-fired plants are closed by 2030 and it invests in 10 GW of renewables and back-up capacity.($1 = 1.3570 Australian dollars)Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterReporting by Sonali Paul in Melbourne and Savyata Mishra in Bengaluru; Editing by Chris ReeseOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. .

Brookfield flips AGL out of furnace into coal fire

Brookfield flips AGL out of furnace into coal fire

MELBOURNE, March 7 (Reuters Breakingviews) – The Canadian fund manager and its tech billionaire partner are abandoning a green takeover plan after their sweetened $6 bln bid was rejected. It leaves the Aussie power producer grappling with a weak demerger proposal and a pushy investor. Boss Graeme Hunt will feel the heat.Full view will be published shortly.Follow @AntonyMCurrie on TwitterRegister now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterCONTEXT NEWS- Brookfield Asset Management and Atlassian co-Chief Executive Mike Cannon-Brookes are walking away from an A$8.3 billion ($6.1 billion) takeover proposal for Australian power company AGL Energy, according to a March 6 tweet by Cannon-Brookes.- The consortium “looking to take private & transform AGL is putting our pens down – with great sadness,” he tweeted.- The decision follows AGL’s board rejection of a sweetened offer at A$8.25 a share, a 10% increase from the original offer.- The revised entreaty valued AGL’s equity at just under A$5.5 billion, a 15% premium to the price on Feb. 18, the day before the Brookfield group made its first offer, and a 31% premium to the three-month volume-weighted average price. Including debt, the offer valued the AGL enterprise at nearly A$8.3 billion.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterEditing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Thomas ShumOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. .

Insurance costs of shipping through Black Sea soar

Insurance costs of shipping through Black Sea soar

The Arkas Line’s Conti Basel container ship is docked in the Black sea port of Odessa, Ukraine, November 4, 2016. REUTERS/Valentyn OgirenkoRegister now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterLONDON, Feb 25 (Reuters) – Insurers have raised the cost of providing cover for merchant ships through the Black Sea, adding to soaring rates to transport goods through the region for vessels still willing to sail after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.Ship owners pay annual war-risk insurance cover as well as an additional “breach” premium when entering high-risk areas. These separate premiums are calculated according to the value of the ship, or hull, for a seven-day period.Ship insurers have quoted the additional premium rate for seven days at anywhere between 1% to 2% and up to 5% of insurance costs, from an estimated 0.025% on Monday before Russia’s invasion began, according to indicative rates from marine insurance sources.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterThis would mean additional costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars for a ship voyage depending on the destination.”Given the Russian offensive from land, sea and air, it would not be surprising if some insurers will be reluctant (to provide cover),” one insurance source said.A Moldovan-flagged chemical tanker was hit by a missile on Friday near Ukraine’s port of Odessa, seriously wounding two crew.On Thursday, a Turkish-owned ship was hit by a bomb off Odessa with no casualties and the ship sailed safely into Romanian waters.Ukraine has appealed to Turkey to block Russian warships from passing through the Dardanelles and Bosphorus straits which lead to the Black Sea, after Moscow on Thursday launched a full-blown assault on Ukraine. read more Russian forces landed at Ukraine’s Black and Azov Sea ports as part of the invasion.Ukraine’s military has suspended commercial shipping at its ports although some Russian Black Sea ports remain open, including Novorossiisk, traders said on Friday.”Due to the sea invasion potential and Crimea’s location in the Black Sea, freight destined for surrounding countries will likely see re-routings and longer transit to meet its final destination,” added Glenn Koepke with supply-chain tracking platform FourKites.Mark Nugent, with shipbroker Braemar ACM, citing satellite tracking data, said a number of dry bulk vessels in the Black Sea had reversed course and were sailing towards the Bosphorus to exit the region.Freight rates have jumped after shipping companies including the world’s top container lines MSC and Maersk and many oil tanker owners suspended sailings through the region.Average earnings for smaller aframax tankers trading in the Black Sea jumped to over $100,000 a day on Thursday from $8,000 a day on Monday, shipping sources said.Earlier this month, London’s marine insurance market added the Ukrainian and Russian waters around the Black Sea and Sea of Azov to its list of areas deemed high risk, which prompted some shipping companies to hold back on sending vessels into the area. read more Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterAdditional reporting by Michael Hogan in Hamburg and Carolyn Cohn in London; Editing by Nick MacfieOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. .

Brookfield Aussie coal bid hits toxic smokescreens

Brookfield Aussie coal bid hits toxic smokescreens

Storm clouds can be seen behind chimneys at the Bayswater coal-powered thermal power station located near the central New South Wales town of Muswellbrook, Australia, March 14, 2017. Picture taken Mach 14, 2017. REUTERS/David Gray Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterMELBOURNE, Feb 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) – Brookfield Asset Management (BAMa.TO) and Grok Ventures’ A$5 billion ($3.6 billion) offer for AGL Energy read more has reignited Australia’s dirty climate wars. The asset manager and the investment fund of Atlassian (TEAM.O) co-founder Mike Cannon-Brookes want to plough up to A$20 billion into the coal-heavy power company to speed its shift to solar and wind. That ought to be a welcome development for a struggling target read more and for a federal government finally paying lip service read more to net-zero greenhouse-gas emissions. Instead, they’re returning to tired old anti-renewables tropes.The bidders face some deserved hurdles as it is. Success would mean Brookfield part-owning not just Australia’s largest power producer and retailer, but also, thanks to a recent A$10 billion club deal for AusNet, significant parts of the country’s transmission grid. That raises potential but probably not insurmountable competition concerns.To seal a deal, wannabe buyers also need to up their 4.8% premium. Some shareholders may agree that AGL’s plan to demerge its two divisions will destroy value, but Brookfield and Grok have to work off where the shares trade, not where they think they should. AGL Chief Executive Graeme Hunt is overplaying his hand implying he needs at least a 30% premium to start talks. But there’s probably some middle ground.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterTrouble is, Hunt is raising the more serious spectre of Brookfield-Grok disrupting the energy market. That seems disingenuous while pitching for a higher offer, but he’s following the government’s lead: On the back of the bid, Prime Minister Scott Morrison warned early coal plant closures mean “electricity prices go up”. Treasurer Josh Frydenberg asserted it was an “indisputable fact” proved by the 2017 closure of Hazelwood power station.That specific comparison is wielded out of context: French owner Engie only gave six months’ notice before switching Hazelwood off, with no plans to replace production. And rising gas prices and big coal suppliers gaming the system also played a big role in price hikes, according to Australia’s own competition commission and researchers at the University of Melbourne.Brookfield and Grok are giving at least eight years’ notice and will only mothball coal once enough renewables are up and running. Of course, a parliamentary election due by May is fuelling tried and tested populist politics. The buyers could do without the toxic smokescreen.Follow @AntonyMCurrie on TwitterCONTEXT NEWS- AGL Energy Chief Executive Graeme Hunt on Feb. 22 said the A$5 billion ($3.6 billion) offer from Brookfield Asset Management and Grok Ventures offered very poor value for shareholders. He told The Australian newspaper that investors “typically, for a change of control…are looking for premium 30-40 plus per cent over whatever the appropriate share trading range is for the company”.- Hunt also called into question the consortium’s ability to replace AGL’s coal-fired power stations with adequate renewable energy sources by 2030. On the same day federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said it was an “indisputable fact” that energy prices will go up if coal-fired power stations close early, referring to the shutdown of the Hazelwood plant in Victoria in 2017.- Any takeover offer which leaves a foreign company owning 10% or more in an Australian company deemed part of critical infrastructure like energy, financial services, food and grocery, and water and sewage is subject to approval by the Foreign Investment Review Board, which submits its recommendations to the country’s Treasurer.- AGL’s bid represents a 4.8% premium to the stock’s closing price on Feb. 18. The prospective buyers made their approach on Feb. 19. The company’s board said on Feb. 21 that it had rejected the offer.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterEditing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Katrina HamlinOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. .

Australia’s AGL Energy rejects $3.5 bln offer, backs decision to split

Australia’s AGL Energy rejects $3.5 bln offer, backs decision to split

  • Australia’s 2nd richest man, Canada’s Brookfield made joint bid
  • Offer was at a 4.7% premium to AGL’s last close
  • AGL says demerger plans on track

Feb 21 (Reuters) – Australian power producer AGL Energy Ltd on Monday rejected a $3.54 billion takeover offer from billionaire Mike Cannon-Brookes and Canada’s Brookfield Asset Management (BAMa.TO) in favour of its plan of splitting in two this year.AGL said the A$7.50 apiece proposal from Cannon-Brookes, Australia’s second-richest man and co-founder of software firm Atlassian, and the Canadian buyout group was a 4.7% premium to the stock’s Friday close and undervalued it.”The proposal does not offer an adequate premium for a change of control and is not in the best interests of AGL Energy shareholders,” AGL Chairman Peter Botten said.Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterThe unsolicited cash proposal with an option for AGL shareholders to elect a scrip alternative also provided limited other information about how the deal would be structured, Botten said.Cannon-Brookes’ investment vehicle, Grok Ventures, and Brookfield did not immediately respond to a request for comment.The profits and value of AGL, Australia’s biggest polluter, have shrunk on government pressure to cut retail rates, waning investor appetite for coal-fired power and an influx of solar and wind energy into the grid.The Australian Financial Review had reported on Sunday that the parties made a joint bid for AGL which included plans to halt its proposed split into a bulk power generator and a carbon-neutral energy retailer. AGL plans to re-brand as Accel Energy and hold the company’s coal-fired power plants and wind farm contracts. It would spin off AGL Australia Ltd, the country’s biggest retailer of electricity and gas, into a separately listed company. read more AGL said earlier this month it had made significant progress in its demerger plans and repeated on Monday that the split was on track to be completed by June. “The board is confident that the demerger will create a strong future for both parts of the business,” Botten said.($1 = 1.3961 Australian dollars)Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comRegisterReporting by Harish Sridharan and Shashwat Awasthi in Bengaluru; editing by Grant McCoolOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. .