More Lithium Mining, Wells Running Dry In California And EV Charging Infrastructure

More Lithium Mining, Wells Running Dry In California And EV Charging Infrastructure

This week’s Current Climate, which every Saturday brings you the latest news about the business of sustainability. Sign up to get it in your inbox every week.
Forbes

This past week we held the inaugural Forbes Sustainability Leaders Summit, where we brought in leaders from multiple industries to talk about solving pressing environmental issues while still ensuring a healthy, vibrant economy. I led a panel featuring Todd Brady, who has been a leader at Intel in driving down its energy use and carbon footprint (Intel, he told the crowd, uses 100% renewable energy in the United States); Gaurab Chakrabarti, the CEO of Solugen, a startup that’s making industrial chemicals like hydrogen peroxide without the messy, energy-intensive processes that utilize oil; and Maddie Hall, whose company Living Carbon is bioengineering trees to both store more carbon dioxide and to grow trees in blighted areas where normal trees can’t grow.

The whole summit was energizing. But what really hit home for me was this simple idea: there’s really no conflict between environment and economy. Intel’s moves towards energy conservation have been good for the company’s bottom line. Solugen is selling its products cost-competitively, without any marketing premium for being green. And Living Carbon’s trees? They produce wood that’s more durable than what’s on the market. You can be green and make green at the same time–all it takes is some clever science and engineering.

The Big ReadJUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES
California’s Water Emergency: Satisfying The Thirst Of Almonds While The Wells Of The People That Harvest Them Run Dry

Broiling heat in the middle of the worst drought in 1,200 years has strained the state’s underground water supply, pitting the Central Valley’s $20 billion agriculture industry against many of its own workers.

Read more here.
Discoveries And Innovations
Researchers have figured out a way to build lithium-ion batteries without using cobalt, which makes them both safer and less prone to market volatility.
California was able to weather a historic heat wave without rolling blackouts because it has gone all-in on clean energy technology like wind, solar, battery storage, and demand response.
NASA scientists developed a way to weigh land masses using two satellites in space, which allowed them to document Greenland’s staggering weight loss from melted ice.
Sustainability Deals Of The Week
Fusion Development: The Department of Energy announced a new $50 million program to support companies, universities and other organizations in developing commercial fusion power technologies.
Aluminum Bottles: Ball Corporation announced that it has partnered with Boomerang Water to provide aluminum bottled water for resorts, cruise ships and other locations; the bottles can be more easily filled and recycled than their plastic counterparts.
On The Horizon
Sustainable technology can find its inspiration everywhere – even older technologies. Here’s a conversation about where future green tech might be going.
What Else We’re Reading This Week
For years, Chile exploited its environment to grow. Now it’s trying to save it. (Popular Science)
Extreme Heat Saps Billions in Worker Productivity (Scientific American)
The Tonga Volcano Shook the World. It May Also Affect the Climate. (New York Times)
Green Transportation UpdateGetty Images
The ongoing transition away from fossil fuels to electricity for our cars and trucks is good for carbon emissions but will likely trigger shortages of key metals used in electric vehicle batteries requiring hundreds of new mines. This is according to industry experts who expect demand for EV batteries to spike to tens of millions of units annually in the years ahead.
The Big Transportation StoryTony Ponds
Black Founders Of EV-Charging Startups Have More Than Profits On Their Minds
Sheryl E. Ponds, whose company designs and builds electric vehicle charging stations, has had success landing business from customers seeking home installations as adoption of the new green technology grows. But for Ponds, who is Black, it’s hard to ignore the fact that those customers tend to be suburban, affluent and white. She values their business, but wants to make sure the infrastructure she develops also reaches urban and Black communities. So last year she started pitching her service to managers of apartment properties in areas where demographics tend to be more diverse — even though sales have been tougher to come by.
Read more here.

More Green Transportation News
Class 8 Hydrogen Truck Competition Disrupted By A Canada-United Kingdom Partnership
Charging EVs At Home Overnight May Not Be The Cheapest Option For Much Longer
Live Longer, Look Sexier And 43 Other Reasons To Ride A Bicycle This World Car Free Day
Battery-Swapping Unlikely To Ruffle Fragile U.S., European Chargers
By The Numbers: How Much Electric Car Battery Range Is Enough?
Amazon Will Power Trucks With ‘Electrofuel’ Diesel To Curb Carbon Emissions
For More Sustainability Coverage, Click Here.
.

GM Super Cruise hands-free system expanding to cover 400,000 miles

GM Super Cruise hands-free system expanding to cover 400,000 miles

That green light means you can take your hands off the wheel. Just keep your eyes on the road!Mack Hogan | CNBCDETROIT – General Motors is expanding its Super Cruise hands-free driving system in the U.S. and Canada later this year, introducing the feature for non-interstate roadways and highways such as Route 66 and the Pacific Coast Highway.With the additional roadways, the driver-assistance system will be usable across more than 400,000 miles of U.S. and Canadian roads, up from about 200,000 miles of strictly divided highway interstates.”These are the main roads that connect the smaller cities and the townships across the U.S. and Canada,” David Craig, GM’s mapping specialist, said during a media briefing. “This is expanding Super Cruise’s availability to many, many millions more customers.”Super Cruise uses a system of sensors and cameras to control steering, braking and acceleration functions of the car without the driver’s input. It also utilizes high-definition maps; a light bar to communicate with the driver; and an in-vehicle monitoring system to ensure drivers remain attentive while Super Cruise is operating.The feature, even with the update, won’t make turns on behalf of the driver or operate in cities, towns and residential streets, like some of Tesla’s driver-assist systems. Super Cruise will also hand control of the vehicle back to drivers if they are approaching an intersection with a stop sign or traffic light.Despite names like Super Cruise, or Tesla’s Autopilot and “Full Self-Driving” brands, these vehicles are not autonomous, or safe to use without a driver behind the wheel.GM said the newest roadways for Super Cruise will be available via over-the-air, or remote, updates, beginning in the fourth quarter of this year for most of its eligible vehicles. GM will not charge for the update, however the optional add-on currently starts at $2,200 or $2,500, depending on the vehicle.GM is expanding its Super Cruise hands-free driving system in the U.S. and Canada later this year to 400,000 miles of roadways,GMGM has slowly increased the availability and capabilities of Super Cruise since it was launched in 2017. It plans to offer Super Cruise on 23 models globally by the end of next year. It’s also announced a new system called “Ultra Cruise,” which GM has said will be capable of handling driving in 95% of scenarios.GM’s premium tier may make the company more directly competitive with Elon Musk-led electric vehicle maker Tesla. Driver-assistance systems from Tesla include the standard Autopilot, and premium option marketed as Full Self-Driving (or FSD), as well as, FSD Beta that lets drivers test out features on public roads before they go into widespread use.Driver-assistance systems have seen an increase in regulatory attention, specifically around accidents involving Tesla vehicles.Mario Maiorana, GM chief engineer of Super Cruise, said the company is in routine communication with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about the rollout of the additional roadways.”We’re not going to put it out until we’ve fully tested it,” Maiorana said, taking a slight jab at Tesla, which has been offering in-development “Beta” systems to some owners.GM’s Super Cruise hasn’t received as much attention or scrutiny as Tesla’s systems, partly due to additional safeguards and the company’s more conservative approach. GM has also only sold roughly 40,000 vehicles with Super Cruise, while Tesla offers some form of its systems on every vehicle it offers.As of the first week of July, NHTSA reported it had opened more than 30 probes since 2016 into collisions involving Tesla vehicles where driver-assistance systems like Autopilot were a suspected factor. The same report noted the federal vehicle watchdog was looking into two nonfatal incidents potentially involving Super Cruise.Tesla crashes under investigation as of the July report have resulted in 16 fatalities of vehicle occupants or pedestrians, according to the agency.Automakers are required by law to report fatal and other serious collisions involving driver-assistance systems to the NHTSA.– CNBC’s Lora Kolodny contributed to this report. .

Elon Musk says Tesla will raise price of FSD by 25% in September

Elon Musk says Tesla will raise price of FSD by 25% in September

Tesla CEO Elon Musk on Sunday announced a 25% price increase for the company’s premium driver assistance system, which is marketed under the name Full Self-Driving, or FSD. The price will increase to $15,000 from $12,000 on Sept. 5, Musk said in a tweet.Today, Tesla charges customers $12,000 upfront for FSD, or $199 per month on a subscription basis.Musk did not immediately mention an increase in the cost of FSD subscriptions and Tesla did not respond to a request for further information.All new Tesla vehicles come with a standard driver assistance package called Autopilot, which includes features like “Traffic-Aware Cruise Control” and “Autosteer.” These rely on cameras, other sensors, hardware and software to automatically keep a Tesla vehicle centered in its lane and traveling at the speed of surrounding traffic.Tesla’s highest-priced driver assistance option, FSD, includes what the company calls “Traffic and Stop Sign Control” and “Navigate on Autopilot” among its features.These more advanced features are intended to let Tesla cars automatically detect and slow down for traffic signs and signals; navigate from highway on-ramp to off-ramp while engaging turn signals; make lane changes and take exits.Tesla tells drivers to remain attentive and be prepared to take over their cars’ steering and braking at any time while using Autopilot or FSD. Its technology does not make Tesla vehicles autonomous.One Tesla feature called Smart Summon allows drivers to use a smartphone and Tesla mobile app like a remote control to call their car from across a parking lot and slowly drive, without anyone behind the wheel, to where they are standing.While some FSD features are also included in a lower-priced option called Enhanced Autopilot, or EAP, only Tesla customers who buy or subscribe to the premium option can request access to FSD Beta, an experimental version of Tesla’s system.FSD Beta users are supposed to obtain a high “Safety Score” from Tesla to get and maintain access to the system.Tesla’s approach has drawn criticism and regulatory scrutiny from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the California Department of Motor Vehicles alike.Still, the company is forging ahead and doing a limited release of the latest version of FSD Beta, to a relatively small pool of users, Musk also tweeted on Sunday.Earlier, he wrote on Twitter, “There are many major code changes, so this will be an extra cautious rollout. Releasing on 8/20 to ~1000 Tesla owners, then 10.69.1 next week to accommodate feedback & release to ~10k customers, then 10.69.2 week after & release to rest of FSD Beta.”Owners who gain access to FSD Beta are able to send feedback to the company via their cars when the system fails or acts glitchy. Tesla previously said 100,000 drivers had already installed FSD Beta.Tesla is planning to make FSD Beta even more mainstream.At the Tesla 2022 Annual Shareholder Meeting on August 4, Musk said that FSD Beta will be available to anyone who requests it by the end of this year. Here’s a quote from Thomson Financial’s transcript of the meeting: “We’re still tracking very much to have widespread deployment of FSD Beta this year in North America. So I should say basically, FSD will be available to anyone who requests it by the end of this year.”Among those who are receiving the limited-release update this weekend are widely followed social media influencers who sell Tesla merchandise and run ad-supported videos on YouTube channels where they review Tesla’s latest releases and more.Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 38 probes into collisions that involved a Tesla vehicle where driver assistance systems including Autopilot and more advanced systems were thought to be a factor. Nineteen fatalities were reported as part of those Tesla-involved collisions under investigation.Separately, California’s DMV recently accused Tesla of deceptive marketing practices with regard to the features in its vehicles, and it is conducting a technical review of Tesla’s systems including FSD Beta.Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s director of Autopilot software, said on Twitter this weekend that “Autopilot prevents ~40 crashes /day where human drivers mistakenly press the accelerator at 100% instead of the brakes.” Tesla generally does not make data about its systems available to third-party researchers for confirmation of its claims. .

Satellite internet tier at $500 per month

Satellite internet tier at $500 per month

SpaceX has quietly rolled out a new, more powerful “premium” tier of its Starlink satellite internet service that’s targeted at businesses and enterprise customers.The new product, which was added to the company’s website Tuesday night, comes at five times the cost of the consumer-focused standard service. Starlink Premium requires a $500 refundable deposit, a $2,500 fee for the antenna and router, and the service costs $500 per month.The standard Starlink service, which launched in October 2020, has a $99 refundable deposit, a $499 hardware fee and the service costs $99 per month.Elon Musk’s company is touting improved hardware, faster service speeds and priority support in its pitch to prospective premium customers.”Starlink Premium has more than double the antenna capability of Starlink, delivering faster internet speeds and higher throughput for the highest demand users, including businesses,” the SpaceX website said.The first premium deliveries will begin in the second quarter, the Starlink website notice added.Starlink Premium also offers “unlimited service locations” flexibility. Unlike the standard product, which only guarantees service at a specific service address, SpaceX says Starlink Premium is capable of connecting from anywhere.”Order as many Starlinks as needed and manage all of your service locations, no matter how remote, from a single account,” SpaceX said.Starlink Premium users can expect download speeds of 150 megabits per second to 500 megabits per second, with latency between 20 milliseconds to 40 milliseconds, the company said. For comparison purposes, the standard service advertises speeds between 100 megabits per second to 200 megabits per second, as well as a tighter latency range.Additionally, SpaceX said the Premium satellite antenna “is designed for improved performance in extreme weather conditions,” although the website offered no further details. The standard Starlink product features a “snow melt functionality” to remove snow and ice.SpaceX continues to advertise unlimited service usage, saying that “at this time there are no data caps.”The company’s standard product has more than 145,000 users in 25 countries worldwide as of January, with nearly 1,900 satellites in orbit. .

Elon Musk abandons deal to buy Twitter; company says it will sue

Elon Musk abandons deal to buy Twitter; company says it will sue

Elon Musk announced Friday that he will abandon his tumultuous $44 billion offer to buy Twitter after the company failed to provide enough information about the number of fake accounts. Twitter immediately fired back, saying it would sue the Tesla CEO to uphold the deal.
The likely unravelling of the acquisition was just the latest twist in a saga between the world’s richest man and one of the most influential social media platforms, and it may portend a titanic legal battle ahead.
Twitter could have pushed for a $1 billion breakup fee that Musk agreed to pay under these circumstances. Instead, it looks ready to fight to complete the purchase, which the company’s board has approved and CEO Parag Agrawal has insisted he wants to consummate.
In a letter to Twitter’s board, Musk lawyer Mike Ringler complained that his client had for nearly two months sought data to judge the prevalence of “fake or spam” accounts on the social media platform.
“Twitter has failed or refused to provide this information. Sometimes Twitter has ignored Mr. Musk’s requests, sometimes it has rejected them for reasons that appear to be unjustified, and sometimes it has claimed to comply while giving Mr. Musk incomplete or unusable information,” the letter said. Musk also said the information is fundamental to Twitter’s business and financial performance, and is needed to finish the merger.
In response, the chair of Twitter’s board, Bret Taylor, tweeted that the board is “committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon” with Musk and “plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement. We are confident we will prevail in the Delaware Court of Chancery.” The trial court in Delaware frequently handles business disputes among the many corporations, including Twitter, that are incorporated there.

Much of the drama surrounding the deal has played out on Twitter, with Musk — who has more than 100 million followers — lamenting that the company was failing to live up to its potential as a platform for free speech.
On Friday, shares of Twitter fell 5% to $36.81, well below the $54.20 that Musk agreed to pay. Shares of Tesla, meanwhile, climbed 2.5% to $752.29. After the market closed and Musk’s letter was published, Twitter’s stock continued to decline while Tesla climbed higher.
“This is a disaster scenario for Twitter and its board,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to investors. He predicted a long court fight by Twitter to either restore the deal or get the $1 billion breakup fee.

On Thursday, Twitter sought to shed more light on how it counts spam accounts in a briefing with journalists and company executives. Twitter said it removes 1 million spam accounts each day. The accounts represent well below 5% of its active user base each quarter. To calculate how many accounts are malicious spam, Twitter said it reviews “thousands of accounts” sampled at random, using both public and private data such as IP addresses, phone numbers, location and account behaviour when active, to determine whether an account is real.
Last month, Twitter offered Musk access to its “fire hose” of raw data on hundreds of millions of daily tweets, according to multiple reports at the time, though neither the company nor Musk confirmed that.
One of the chief reasons Musk gave for his interest in taking Twitter private was his belief he could add value to the business by getting rid of its spam bots — the same problem that he’s now citing as a reason to end the deal.
“This whole process has been bizarre,” said Christopher Bouzy, founder of research firm Bot Sentinel, which tracks fake Twitter accounts used for disinformation or harassment. “He knew about this problem. It’s odd that he would use bots and trolls and inauthentic accounts as a way of getting out of the deal.”

On the other hand, Bouzy said, the letter from Musk’s legal team makes some valid critiques of Twitter’s lack of transparency, including its apparent refusal to provide Musk with the same level of internal data it offers some of its big customers.
“It just seems as if they’re hiding something,” said Bouzy, who also believes the number of fake or spam Twitter accounts is higher than what the company has reported.
Musk’s lawyer also alleged that Twitter broke the agreement when it fired two top managers and laid off a third of its talent-acquisition team. The sale agreement, he wrote, required Twitter to “seek and obtain consent” if it deviated from conducting normal business. Twitter was required to “preserve substantially intact the material components of its current business organization,” the letter said.
Musk’s flirtation with buying Twitter appeared to begin in late March. That’s when Twitter said he contacted members of its board — including co-founder Jack Dorsey — and told them he was buying up shares of the company and was interested in either joining the board, taking Twitter private or starting a competitor.
Parag Agrawal, Parag Agrawal Twitter, Indian born CEOs, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, Jack Dorsey, silicon valley Jack Dorsey stepped down as chief executive of Twitter, the social media site he co-founded in 2006.
Then, on April 4, he revealed in a regulatory filing that he had became the company’s largest shareholder after acquiring a 9% stake worth about $3 billion.
At first, Twitter offered Musk a seat on its board. But six days later, Agrawal tweeted that Musk would not be joining the board after all.
His bid to buy the company came together quickly after that.
When Musk agreed to buy Twitter for $54.20 per share, he inserted a “420” marijuana reference into his price. He sold roughly $8.5 billion worth of shares in Tesla to help fund the purchase, then strengthened his commitments of more than $7 billion from a diverse group of investors including Silicon Valley heavy hitters like Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison.
Inside Twitter, Musk’s offer was met with confusion and falling morale, especially after Musk publicly criticised one of Twitter’s top lawyers involved in content-moderation decisions.
Groups opposing the takeover from the outset — including those advocating for women, minorities and LGBTQ people — cheered Friday’s news.
“Despite what Musk may claim, this deal isn’t ending because of Twitter bots or spam accounts. This deal is collapsing because of Elon Musk’s own erratic behaviour, embrace of extremists and bad business decisions,” said Angelo Carusone, president of Media Matters, a left-leaning nonprofit watchdog group that’s been critical of Musk’s Twitter bid.
Musk, he said, “made it clear that he would roll back Twitters’ community standards and safety guidelines, which would turn the platform into a fever swamp of dangerous conspiracy theories, partisan chicanery and white supremacist radicalization.”
.