Schumer moves forward on Medicare drug price negotiations with Manchin’s support — reports – Endpoints News

Months af­ter Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) es­sen­tial­ly squashed De­moc­rats’ hopes of pass­ing the Build Back Bet­ter Act, which in­clud­ed pro­pos­als to low­er drug prices, a sec­ond at­tempt is re­port­ed­ly un­der­way that pass­es muster with all Sen­ate De­moc­rats.
First re­port­ed by Punch­bowl, Sen­ate Ma­jor­i­ty Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is sub­mit­ting a po­ten­tial rec­on­cil­i­a­tion pack­age to the Sen­ate par­lia­men­tar­i­an that in­cludes an agree­ment backed by all 50 Sen­ate De­moc­rats, in­clud­ing Manchin, to al­low Medicare to ne­go­ti­ate pre­scrip­tion drug costs.
The mat­ter is now in the hands of the par­lia­men­tar­i­an, who will be­gin re­view­ing the pro­pos­al to make sure that it falls un­der the Sen­ate’s rules on rec­on­cil­i­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to Punch­bowl.
Ac­cord­ing to a sum­ma­ry of the pro­vi­sions ac­quired by Punch­bowl, the 190-page pro­pos­al in­cludes:

  • al­low­ing Medicare to be­gin ne­go­ti­at­ing on the price of pre­scrip­tion drugs start­ing next year
  • cap­ping a pa­tient’s out-of-pock­et costs at $2,000 per year
  • adding an “in­fla­tion re­bate” to cap price in­creas­es be­yond in­fla­tion
  • ac­cess to free vac­cines for se­niors

“Sen­a­tor Manchin has long ad­vo­cat­ed for pro­pos­als that would low­er pre­scrip­tion drug costs for se­niors and his sup­port for this pro­pos­al has nev­er been in ques­tion,” Manchin spokesper­son Sam Run­y­on told Busi­ness In­sid­er in a state­ment. “He’s glad that all 50 De­moc­rats agree.”
The West Vir­ginia sen­a­tor ef­fec­tive­ly de­railed a tril­lion-dol­lar spend­ing pack­age backed by Pres­i­dent Biden and De­moc­rats last year — si­mul­ta­ne­ous­ly halt­ing a bevy of health­care-re­lat­ed pro­vi­sions in the bill. Be­fore that, De­moc­rats had nev­er been so close to pass­ing ma­jor drug pric­ing re­forms.

In­dus­try group PhRMA has blast­ed the De­moc­rats’ drug pric­ing pro­pos­al, ar­gu­ing months ago that the bill would “throw sand in the gears of med­ical progress.” The group of­fered sim­i­lar crit­i­cism on Wednes­day, with PhRMA’s EVP of pub­lic af­fairs De­bra DeShong say­ing in a state­ment:
The pre­scrip­tion drug bill re­leased to­day went from bad to worse for pa­tients. De­moc­rats weak­ened pro­tec­tions for pa­tient costs in­clud­ed in pre­vi­ous ver­sions, while dou­bling down on sweep­ing gov­ern­ment price-set­ting poli­cies that will threat­en pa­tient ac­cess and fu­ture in­no­va­tions. In fact, they are propos­ing to re­peal a pol­i­cy that would have di­rect­ly low­ered costs at the phar­ma­cy for mil­lions of se­niors in fa­vor of a new price-set­ting scheme. The bill al­so ig­nores the role of mid­dle­men and in­sur­ers in de­ter­min­ing pa­tient out-of-pock­et costs. Un­for­tu­nate­ly, PBMs and in­sur­ers will con­tin­ue to ben­e­fit by shift­ing more of the cost bur­den to pa­tients when it comes to coin­sur­ance and pre­mi­um in­creas­es. Pa­tients de­serve bet­ter.
Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go re­searchers re­cent­ly ar­gued that Medicare ne­go­ti­a­tions would lead to a re­duc­tion of $663 bil­lion in R&D spend­ing through 2039, and 135 few­er new drug ap­provals. How­ev­er, the Con­gres­sion­al Bud­get Of­fice sug­gest­ed back in No­vem­ber that Medicare ne­go­ti­a­tions would on­ly re­sult in 10 few­er drugs (out of a cal­cu­lat­ed to­tal of 1,300 drug ap­provals) over 30 years.